One of the reasons public funding of farmer-valuable projects, (ie Harmon oats) is no longer being feasible or being pursued, is because biotech is aggressively swallowing all available funding.
Lobbyists are settled in Parliament Hill like bedbugs.
There is safety in supporting BOTH public and private funding
Farmers themselves can dedicate more dollars to public funding by reducing funding to biotech.
Would farmers prefer allotting more money to public funding which governments might them match? Pars
Lobbyists are settled in Parliament Hill like bedbugs.
There is safety in supporting BOTH public and private funding
Farmers themselves can dedicate more dollars to public funding by reducing funding to biotech.
Would farmers prefer allotting more money to public funding which governments might them match? Pars
Comment