• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Western Grains Research Foundation Approves $3.8 Million Breeding Tools Initiative

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Western Grains Research Foundation Approves $3.8 Million Breeding Tools Initiative

    January 10, 2011 / Saskatoon

    Western Grains Research Foundation (WGRF) is pleased to announce funding for a new research initiative that will strengthen and advance public cereal breeding programs across Western Canada. WGRF has approved Endowment Fund Directed Research Program funding of $3.8 Million dollars over the next five years for an initiative to develop genomic tools, increase genomic capacity, and enhance the use of doubled haploid in cereal crop breeding programs.

    Most Canadian breeding programs already utilize some doubled haploid and genomic technology. However, the full potential of these technologies is not being fully exploited because implementation has not kept pace with changing technology. Breeders currently rely on marker technology with limited through-put capacity, restricting breeding programs to evaluating only a few marker-trait combinations in a few targeted plant populations.

    Greater use of genomic technologies will mean faster, more accurate identification of the best genes available in seed germplasm to breed into varieties for commercial production. Doubled haploid technology accelerates the cycle of crop breeding. Together, these technologies can get improved varieties into farmers’ fields quicker and add to the producer’s bottom line.

    “WGRF is excited about the impact this breeding tools initiative can have for producers,” says Don Dewar, WGRF Vice-Chairman and Chairman of the Endowment Fund Advisory Committee. “The potential to accelerate the crop breeding cycle and speed the release of improved varieties to market is a worthwhile and powerful investment for producers to make.”

    The research initiative being funded is a joint initiative being lead by Dr. Curtis Pozniak at the University of Saskatchewan’s Crop Development Centre, and Dr. François Eudes and Dr. Brent McCallum, both with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC).

    “This project is truly a public collaboration” notes Dr. Pozniak. “All of the major public research institutions with activities in wheat breeding and science are contributing to the research effort. The research being conducted will ensure that breeders have access to the latest technologies to develop higher yielding, disease resistant cultivars with an end-use quality package in demand by over-seas customers. Dr. Eudes adds, “With this project, we are looking at establishing an invaluable breeding tool for cereal breeders that will shorten the cycle of wheat and barley cultivar development.”

    This is one of many important strategic research initiatives WGRF will fund through the Endowment Fund Directed Research Program on behalf of Western Canadian crop producers. WGRF expects to fund initiatives in priority areas like Fusarium Head Blight /DON/Mycotoxins; Post-Harvest Handling to Address Quality/Market Access; Pest and Weather Surveillance; Agronomy; and New Crops and Crop Uses.

    “The decision to fund this crop breeding tool initiative for major cereal crops and the previously announced one million dollar investment by WGRF in the Phytotron renewal project at the University of Saskatchewan to support research for a broad range of crops are important steps towards keeping Western Canadian producers at the forefront of crop research.” notes Dewar.



    -30-



    For further information, contact:



    Mike Espeseth

    Communications Manager

    Western Grains Research Foundation

    (306) 975-0365

    communications@westerngrains.com

    Curtis Pozniak, Ph.D.

    Associate Professor

    University of Saskatchewan Crop Development Centre

    (306) 966-2361

    curtis.pozniak@usask.ca

    Francois Eudes, Ph.D.

    Cereal Biotechnologist

    Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

    (403) 382-3156

    francois.eudes@agr.gc.ca



    Backgrounder

    A key change to WGRF Endowment Fund Policy in 2010 was the addition of the Directed Research Program (DRP). This new program allows WGRF to become more directive with respect to the research funded. Each year, WGRF plans to approve funding under the DRP of at least $2.5 million over five years for DRP research projects. Funding in initial years will be higher than this planned target.

    Since 1981 the WGRF Endowment Fund has provided over $21 million dollars in funding to over 200 research projects across all crop types through its traditional Letter of Intent (LOI) program, which will continue in addition to the Directed Research Program. The LOI program will also see its research spending increase, with annual approved funding of about $800,000 over three years for LOI projects.

    In response to last summer’s call for Directed Research Program proposals in the area of Crop Breeding Tools, attractive research proposals from a producer perspective were received by WGRF. At WGRF’s request, researchers consolidated the proposed research activities into a single initiative in order to ensure the benefits of collaboration among research institutions are achieved and cost of the research initiative is affordable.

    The main thrust of the initiative is the development of two technology platforms that will be used by WGRF-funded cereal breeding programs in Western Canada. First, a genomics platform is to be developed using molecular information derived from sequencing of our best wheat cultivars that would then be used for high throughput marker assisted breeding. Secondly, a doubled haploid platform will be created based on the development and deployment of an integrated microspore culture (IMC).

    IMC is one of the three common techniques allowing to rapidly fix the genetics of crosses made by breeders. It accelerates the process of new varieties by 3 to 4 years. The use of genomic technologies in support of traditional breeding will allow for the design of effective selection strategies to combine the best genes available in germplasm to meet new demands for commercially relevant traits.

    #2
    gustgd,

    What happend to our $60m plus that came from the rail overcharge?

    What are they doing with it?

    Comment


      #3
      Probably earning interest on it and using those earnings for funding the above projects.

      Comment


        #4
        Tom
        Total endowment fund is at almost $90 million dollars.

        Policy is to spend only the interest on projects that meet criteria, and if we spend more repopulate the fund ASAP.(not my idea)

        If you have ideas post them and we can discuss. While I was away I saw you are not happy with WGRF

        Make sure you let someone know if you are unhappy. If you pull your money out without input we wont notice.

        If one farm removes money for very good reasons, or just because we can't track individuals and wouldn't notice. one farm /- is less than a rounding error.

        bucket is exactly right.

        Comment


          #5
          Perennial wheat for farmers.
          Perennial barley for farmers

          Farmers can see the benefit.

          Pars

          Comment


            #6
            But what, would be the consequenses?

            Comment


              #7
              http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1257338930496&lang=eng

              Going to snip pieces out of genes,bno matter, so create a perennial wheat so that at the very least, farmers can make a little money. Pars

              Comment


                #8
                Will have to go to end point royalties to pay for the seed development, and all regulatory costs to get it to market.

                looks like it will be the obvious way to pay for development costs and not have slippage other than feed.

                Comment


                  #9
                  gustgd,

                  If the railway donation isn't gone in ten years... you wasted my money.

                  Interest is almost zero... so spending interest is not a rational policy.

                  I would like to see some beneficial developments in my lifetime... since it is present growers who paid the $60m... it should be spent on good projects.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I would point out we are not getting Zero for a bank balance. It's NOT just sitting in the chequing account. WGRF is subject to very specific investment criteria set out by the feds. WGRF(Western farmers) money is invested with a professional manager.

                    Tom you mentioned we should spend the money in "10" years. Are you picturing a mission to the moon project. That is identify a goal and spend 60 million to achieve that goal.
                    What would be your goal.

                    Some farmers say YEILD
                    some say improved input use
                    others say specific traits.
                    There's even an Grannie from south east Sk. that pounds a perennial drum.

                    I am more interested in traits that end users or processors desire.

                    Can you imagine a flax that does not go rancid when ground? Or even if it took longer? What would it be worth to western farmers if demand went up. It might even make it worth the BS of growing it.

                    Take away is that the WGRF board decided on a policy of directed research. Please contact the association or directors with ideas on where we should start directing.

                    The policy for now is to only spend interest, but policy can definitely change. Ultimately we are all accountable to our member organizations.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      How about a perennial wheat with improved yeild, allelotoxin gene and nitrogen fixation capabilities.

                      R&D paid for from WGRF fund, farmers money so no royalties. Unless something changes the fund is going to keep growing.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        gustgd,

                        Spending just the interest!

                        What is the revenue from the $60M growers sent to WGRF? 2%?

                        Sucking our capital away from us... and not investing it research... JUST spending the interest... IS STUPID.

                        GET IT NOW????

                        Comment


                          #13
                          This 'interest' logic is something the CWB would come up with!!!

                          If you can't find good projects... do not expect me to send any more money... YOU ALREADY HAVE WAY TOO MUCH... if all you do is spend the interest!!!

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I would like to clarify that the money that came to WGRF from the railways overcharging on rail car maitnence was by legistlation. I was not in farm policy when said legistlation was drafted.

                            As I understand it, no one thought that the railways would have missed the target by so much. To be fair it was a change in the way maitanence charges were calculated that made it so.

                            Again as I understand it. giving the money back to the farms that origanoly were overcharged without a reasonable chance of not spending the next x number of years in court fighting over decisions made.

                            One more time The endowment fund money is split among ALL crops. The checkoff money from wheat goes to wheat. The checkoff money from barley sales goes to barley. One of the reasons that we were looking at broadening the checkoff was for industrial uses. As it is now most of the research goes into bread wheats as thats where the money came from.

                            wmoebis, If no royalties were paid how would ongoing research be funded? not being sarcastic just trying to anticipate questions.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I would antisipate that there would still be check offs and have no doubt that without a change in policy, there will still be over charges by rail co's. The endowment fund will always be there drawing interest.

                              Perhaps!!

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...