Debate

[TOM4CWB]

Fransisco,

" ....we will be looking closely the next time Ignatieff’s waves his little red book — just to see if it is actually the Liberals’ party platform or Mao’s.

And so should you."

Well said.
Tax and Spend.
Iggy knows best!

[Burbert]

Hold your nose, go to the poll and vote in
another Comedian government. What a sad
state of affairs, when the only ones that
I want to vote for, want to breakup
Comedia and don't run in our area. Then
there are the GREENS that weren't allowed
to be in the debate. Sad, sad, sad. What
a totally f'd up country we live in.......

[riders2010]

Well Harper said we are in such great shape? so are we or are we not is what people are asking. Tax breaks to the rich and famous and then cut the gst money has to come from somewhere, I just don't see how you can do that and then go on the spending spree for prisons jets etc.

I was against the gst years ago but it's upfront you know what it is the guys with money that buy more pay more, it doesn't hurt the rich, and gov has a reliable reasonably forecastable amount of money to work with.

the stimulus if it is used to repair or improve infrastructure why not has to be done some time and if it helps out jobs during a downturn why not, I agree when you give stimulus money to bankers and big oil, auto execs, when average families need to use credit cards to buy food and clothing, then there is a problem. jmo.

[mustardman]

Franny have you've been watching beck's blackboard conspiracy theories again?
Get real comparing one line to a line by Mao, thats a stretch

The Real question you should be asking Yourself is can you vote for a man who has such disregard for democracy as Stephen not slandering the messenger

[Fransisco]

"you should be asking Yourself is can you vote for a man who has such disregard for democracy"

That's a good question. How can anyone vote for someone who was absent for 70% of the votes in the house of commons, had a white supremacist as a candidate for well over a year, another one who thinks its okay to sexually assault woman, and then to top it all off quotes chairman Mao in the national leaders debate.

[gregpet]

Yeah but Fran its a stretch, not like anything is stretched to reach conclusions about Harper.

[TOM4CWB]

'After going through the multitudes of punditry commentary on last night’s leader debate, this piece by David Olive who gives all the other Harper-haters at the Toronto Star a run for their money for top spot, best describes how it went:

“Stephen Harper was the big winner in last night’s English-language leaders debate. He was statesmanlike, fielding almost every question, no matter how tough or gratuitous, with grace and an impressive command of detail, as you would expect of a chief executive. In doing so, he managed to make the others look like glib malcontents when they weren’t squabbling among themselves”

[riders2010]

I must have missed how he answered why prostitutes, money launderers, and 5 time fraud artists hang out at the nations capital when everyday Canadians cannot even attend one of the party election rallies. I'll have to look at it again I guess.

Last thing we need is a ultra right wing majority cause that crap he's showing now isn't gonna get better. This isn't the Conservative party this is Reform party of Canada.

[mustardman]

Yes if I use Franny conspiracy blackboard it comes up that Stephen is a borderline Faschist LOl

[gregpet]

I think you came to that conclusion with your imajinary factual blackboard mustard.