Brenda:
I don't disagree with your comments that a pool
does not require govt involvement. But, two
things:
1. Pools like the Viterra bean pool already have
government involvement with government
guarantees on their initial payments. Ontario
wheat board too.
2. What I am suggesting is that whatever the
Feds think they need to do for the CWB, they
should not restrict it to just the CWB. There is
nothing magic about the CWB once the act is
gone and what remains should not be treated
any better than any other competing entity. If the
government guarantees are to be extended for a
period, then they should be available to others as
well.
If the Feds favour the CWB shell, even for an
interim period, then they haven't gone far
enough, IMHO.
The antithesis of a monopoly is competition - so
why stop at one pool provider.
I don't disagree with your comments that a pool
does not require govt involvement. But, two
things:
1. Pools like the Viterra bean pool already have
government involvement with government
guarantees on their initial payments. Ontario
wheat board too.
2. What I am suggesting is that whatever the
Feds think they need to do for the CWB, they
should not restrict it to just the CWB. There is
nothing magic about the CWB once the act is
gone and what remains should not be treated
any better than any other competing entity. If the
government guarantees are to be extended for a
period, then they should be available to others as
well.
If the Feds favour the CWB shell, even for an
interim period, then they haven't gone far
enough, IMHO.
The antithesis of a monopoly is competition - so
why stop at one pool provider.
Comment