If seven so called "pro choice" directors of the cwb sat down in front of a public press conference to discuss what their own opinions are for the future of the cwb, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN? What "could" happen to them?
What about what "could" happen to them if they were to discuss the things happening in the board room of the cwb in the past few months?
My feeling is that their silence is speaking volumes about their character. If they had a backbone they would say what they think and let the chips fall where they may.
If they get booted off the board can the gov't reappoint them?
What about what "could" happen to them if they were to discuss the things happening in the board room of the cwb in the past few months?
My feeling is that their silence is speaking volumes about their character. If they had a backbone they would say what they think and let the chips fall where they may.
If they get booted off the board can the gov't reappoint them?
Comment