dumb question sorry about your farming

[parsley]

FR, just to show goodwill, I'll indeed rent you my cat and you'll only pay for the measurable time spent on the tractor... with him listening intently.

He's a quick learner. You have ready cash. I'm a reasonable woman.

The perfect partnership. Pars

[perfecho]

Science said "lets feed ground ruminate to ruminants, cheap food cost" and there are many more scenarios........the problem is science is not rational, it is being paid for by someone with an agenda!

[Hopperbin]

I thought anwering this question may not be good. Mallee do you guys grow genetically modified canola yet? How do you control your weeds in Australia if you don't spray in crop, can you control weeds properly after crop? Maybe with your hot summer everything just dies anyway.

[hobbyfrmr]

I received this weblink email the other day from a conventional farmer. I would like to think reuters has some factual reporting and hopefully less sensational articles. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/31/glyphosate-pollution-idUSN1E77U15Q20110831?feedType=RSS&feedName=compan yNews&rpc=43.
I am an organic farmer because my farm was too small and inefficent to be profitable conventionally. I am not against conventional farmers doing what they have to to make a living, I did the same thing for 13 years. Now that I am on the outside looking in, I do see the dependancy on glyphosate. Its regarded as a necessity along with a good high clearance sprayer. I am not a chemist, but 360grams per acre of glyphosate, twice per year (burn off and pre harvest) for a decade would eventually show up somewhere! But..I do know the neighbors grow very big, clean crops and thats their goal. So, that part is working,and the fert/chem industry is right behind them with a free jacket, patting them on the back and taking them out for lunch!! The best summary about all this was on a different post about "feeding the world".
Chuckchuck said "Monsanto and company are not interested in small scale poor farmers because they can't make money from them."
wd9 said, " Crop life is not saying the whole world, just the world that can afford to grow biotech crops. They don't really care what happens with the production after its grown just as long as their technology is bought, and bought every year.
Its the same reason every 6 year old needs an iphone. Good marketing."
I fully and completely agree. with both these observations.

[hobbyfrmr]

I re-read my post, it am not trying to ruffle feathers here, its just an observation.

[TOM4CWB]

Hopper,

So different down under.

I understand they grow primarily winter crops (Planted in fall, [April-June])... it is spring right now... so they harvest when it gets really hot (Nov-Jan-mid summer) which normally kills everything off... so natural desication occurs because of the climate.

Is this right Mallee?

Parsley... Glyphos is registered in the EU on seed crops too. If timing is proper glyphosate does not effect germs... only if done too early.

You run a much much higher risk of being hurt by the adjuvants in your shampoo... than Roundup.

The mouse and rabbit studies you quote are listed in this paper... have a read!

http://www.msal.gov.ar/agroquimicos/pdf/Williams-et-al-2000.pdf

[hobbyfrmr]

TOM I gave that paper a read, and, here is part of the summary, as you described.
Summary
Results from several investigations establish that
the acute toxicity and irritation potential of Roundup
herbicide in humans is low. Specifically, results from
controlled studies with Roundup showed that skin irritation
was similar to that of a baby shampoo and
lower than that observed with a dishwashing detergent
and an all-purpose cleaner; no dermal sensitization,
photoirritation, or photosensitization reactions were
148 WILLIAMS, KROES, AND MUNRO
observed. Furthermore, the incidence of occupationalrelated
cases involving Roundup is low given the widespread
use of the product. Data from these cases indicated
some potential for eye and skin irritation with
the concentrated product, but exposure to dilute spray
solutions rarely resulted in any significant adverse
effect. Most importantly, no lasting dermal or ocular
effects were noted, and significant systemic effects attributable
to contact with Roundup did not occur. Studies
of Roundup ingestion showed that death and other
serious effects occurred only when large amounts were
intentionally ingested for the purpose of committing
suicide. These data confirmed that the acute oral toxicity
in humans is low and consistent with that predicted
by the results of laboratory studies in animals.

I find this reassuring.

[cottonpicken]

I agree with Pars on this one.

For every action there is a reaction,a price will have to
be paid.

But its the chemicals that kill the bugs that freak me
out.

[hedgehog]

Roundup is a fantastic chemical, i reckon it won us the cold war.
when i went to russia in 1993 it was wall to wall couch grass, not much wheat.
But we are overusing it. resistance will develop, the more we use it, the faster it will develop.
one application at full rate ervery 3rd yr should be the max, and it will be useful for much longer.
use reglone in between.
Antibiotics are regulated now, but the damage hs been done already by overuse and folks not finishing the course.

[malleefarmer]

why do my posts always end up in a bitch fight?????lol

[Hopperbin]

Sorry about that Mallee but you gotta laugh when the bugs are freaking Cotton out. Hedgehog we do have other options but glyphosate is the cheaper product. If say for instance we did have some resistance show up then we could use that chemical we call Liberty, which we don't yet but if that one would develop resistance then we could use a concoction that is more expensive yet. If all else fails we can use tillage. Now if them super weeds start eating our tires then we are in deep shit.

[parsley]

Because mallee, I can be a bitch, and I'm up for a good fight on the important issues.