• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here comes the BS...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Here comes the BS...

    http://www.cwb.ca/public/en/newsroom/releases/2011/news_release.jsp?news=091211.jsp

    Farmers vote to keep Canadian Wheat Board

    September 12, 2011

    Winnipeg - Tens of thousands of Western Canadian farmers have sent a clear message to Ottawa, demanding the CWB single-desk marketing system be retained.

    Results of the CWB's plebiscite, released today, show a strong majority of farmers want to maintain their ability to market wheat and barley through a single-desk system. Sixty-two per cent of respondents voted in favour of retaining the single desk for wheat and 51 per cent voted to retain it for barley. A total of 38,261 farmers submitted mail-in ballots in the plebiscite, a participation rate of 56 per cent - on par with the last three federal elections and higher than many municipal and provincial elections.

    "Farmers have spoken. Their message is loud and clear, and the government must listen," said Allen Oberg, chair of the CWB's farmer-controlled board of directors. "Western Canadian producers have voted to keep their single-desk marketing system for wheat and barley. They cannot be ignored.

    "We will not sit back and watch this government steamroll over farmers. We are going to stand our ground and fight for farmers."

    The federal government plans to remove the CWB single desk by August 1, 2012. Minister Gerry Ritz has announced that enabling legislation will be introduced this fall, also removing the current legal requirement that such a change first be approved by Prairie farmers through an official plebiscite. The CWB's plebiscite was conducted to give producers a voice through a fair and democratic process.

    Oberg said the plebiscite results show that the federal government is out of touch with farmers.

    "For months, Minister Ritz has been claiming that the recent federal election was a mandate for the government to dismantle the CWB. Now we know otherwise. There is no mandate from farmers to strip away their marketing power."

    Oberg said the CWB's board of directors is calling on the Government of Canada to respect the decision of farmers. He said the high participation rate leaves no doubt about what farmers want.

    "The number of producers who voted shows that they are passionate about the CWB and demand a say in its future. As farmers, the CWB is our marketing organization. We pay for it, we run it, we have the right to decide its future. The government must now acknowledge this mandate from farmers and respect this decision."

    MNP, a chartered accountancy and business advisory firm, coordinated the plebiscite and tabulated the results. More information can be found on the official plebiscite Web site at www.cwbvote.ca .

    #2
    51 PER CENT ON BARLEY IS A STRONG MAJORITY.
    When you consider that most barley producers did not
    receive a ballot because most feed barley producers
    don't sell through the board. What would the board
    have done if the results were at 49 per cent.

    Comment


      #3
      Who gives a shit about barley it makes you itchy, I say **** it.

      Comment


        #4
        An excellent strategy I-F.

        Interesting the comments in the press conference about the tight win margin on barley. The solution is more barley payment/pricing options.

        Comment


          #5
          Charlie,

          I am truly surprised how close the results were for the open market side.

          Why no vote on Durum?

          Obviuosly the CWB KNOWS they would have lost that one!!!

          Had a fair choice (on the plebicite) been given... market choice would have won handily on wheat. Minister Ritz and PM Harper got exactly the expected result to the CWB survey result... with added comfort that the non votes push 'market choice' to a pleasant victory over the 'single desk'. 39,000 ballots were specifically and intentionally pledged to our strong stable majority Conservative government.



          God Bless Canada!!!

          Comment


            #6
            I will leave the political issues alone. As an observer, was not surprised on wheat given the numbers are so close to the last several producer surveys when asked a two part question. 38 per cent who want something different is a large number of farmers by any measure. Acres and ages of farmers represented by the 38 per cent would even be more interesting. Irrelevant questions to the process however - just interesting observations regardless of the outcome.

            Barley result was different than the producer survey - farmers indicated a desire for an open market by a wide margin in the 2011 version. Would be interesting to get the breakdown of results by province. Also results if a broader range of barley growers than just permit book holders. I know non permit book holders could have jumped the hoops to vote but why both for a non binding survey? Feed barley is already an open market crop including the export market (CWB sources directly from the trade on the most recent cargoes with no direct involvement farmers).

            All speculation. Irrelevant to what will happen.

            Comment


              #7
              Gee Tom you think durum isn't wheat??

              Comment


                #8
                If durum and wheat excluding durum are the same, why are there separate pricing pools.

                Irrelevant but would be interesting what the results of a plebescite would be if you separated mid quality classes like winter wheat and prairie spring out from CWRS.

                Comment


                  #9
                  With a voters list, one could have pointed out that the ballots exceeded those entitled to vote. One could point out that deceased persons should be ineligible, duplicates should be cancelled, and other examples of how the list appearseddeliberately skewed.
                  But such a tactic of a lack of a public voters list is exactly in line with the way the CWB operates. Its also why I want no part of a compulsary organization with such ideas how democracy should work.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Durum farmers may well have a very poor impression of the CWB handling of their production. No one could have performed more poorly in marketing this crop.
                    In fact I have yet to see any compliment on this site that indicated anyone could commend the CWB for its durum marketing prowess.
                    And this is with holding more cards (majority of exportable supply, no futures market in your way, single desk; quality product handed to CWB, no competing buyerss except ethanol plants) than any seller could ever expect.
                    And the recent year's results, year after year, are acceptable performance?????

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Along with Durum we can also add feed wheat where
                      the board has no selling skill. Heading into harvest
                      with elevators plugged with feed wheat after a year of
                      record corn prices.If there was ever a selling
                      opportunity at reasonable prices this was the year. So
                      while board employees get their regular pay check and
                      perks we get to contend with binning our whole crop
                      because we have no delivery opportunities.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Craig,

                        Conola was a real hard run to market and deliver the 2010 crop. 30 percent green. Yet we made it through with flying colours and with extra time.

                        I agree the feed grain marketing skills of the CWB are not helping us!

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...