• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Barley County AB Barely Commission Sept 2011

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    For what it is worth, the charter challenge occurred over 10 years ago. Alway interesting to see how long peoples memories are. For some it just seems like yesterday I guess.

    [URL="http://www.albertabarley.com/pdf/annualreport2001.pdf"]2011 annual report page 2[/URL]

    ABC has done a lot to increase levy collection starting at getting more feedlots/feed mills on board. The way they do this is to show value to stakeholders.

    Comment


      #17
      Oops. Link should show 2001 annual report. The 2010 link is below. Albertans can read the annual reports to determine value.

      [URL="http://www.albertabarley.com/commission/accountability/documents/AnnualReport2010.pdf"]2010 annual report[/URL]

      Comment


        #18
        IF'N the cwb meets its demise, then there
        will be no need fer the AB Barely
        Commission either. IT"LL have
        accomplished its goal, and that of the AB
        gobermont. This org is currently HEADLESS
        at the momment anyway.........

        Comment


          #19
          Burbert

          Hate to disagree but the need to invest in barley research remains to
          stem the decline in barley acres in western Canada. Barley is important
          for Alberta's livestock industry in general and cattle in particular. It is
          also important for the malt industry. Work has to continue to improve
          barley's profitability and competitiveness relative to other crops or acres
          will continue to decline.

          How Western Grain Research Foundation continues to be funded is a
          concern. Likely will follow the ABC model including expanding to
          collecting levies on the domestic feed market. Lots of discussion in other
          threads.

          But I guess you will agree that any organization has to survive on its
          business merits as indicated by stakeholders willingness to invest/use
          its services.

          Comment


            #20
            Burbert,

            Opportunity expands exponentially to increase productivity and profitability as we remove the export restrictions on Barley. I state the obvious. We need better new barley varieties and productivity. Healthy food is key to feeding a hungry world... Barley is a very healthy food ingredient... often times better for us than wheat!

            ABC has been working on this solution since its inception... and has just nipped the surface of solutions to reduce health care costs and increase life expectancy of our civilisation!

            Be KIND Burbert.

            Comment


              #21
              TOM4CWB

              Your posting above here highlighted the risk of doing nothing and
              continuing to live in a commodity world with no innovation/research.
              Russia, Ukraine, Kazakstan, etc (non traditional exporters) are coming
              on like gang busters with improvements in productivity setting the
              stage for the world cereal markets. Continuing on our current course
              means we are going to go head to head with them in the future (starting
              this year). These countries are getting their act together on a whole
              bunch of fronts including quality, logistics, phytosanity, etc. Not rock
              science. Just doing what Canada does.

              Aging population equals the need for more fibre in North America.
              Barley beta glutens equals healthier bowels. An opportunity.

              Comment


                #22
                Charliep.

                You make the interesting comment that "barley is important for the Alberta livestock industry, the malt industry, and aging population diet, feeding the world, and ..." I imagine that you might agree that the primary producer is only a small fraction of this barley importance, so ABC will be collecting checkoffs from all barley chain users, right? Do you have a breakdown of percentages of each contributing group?

                Comment


                  #23
                  Can't answer that question directly. Will note the power of
                  commissions is partnering with other producer groups (eg. WGRF,
                  CWB, livestock groups, etc), government and private industry. From
                  the Alberta Barley Commission website, they have been able to lever
                  their funds 12 times (every dollar of ABC funding results in $12
                  invested in research and other activities). Dollars investment gives
                  farmers a say in research activities. Leverage expands the magnitude
                  of what can be accomplished.

                  Example in Alberta. Both Alberta Beef Producers and Alberta Barley
                  Commission are active investors in the Lacombe feed barley breeding
                  programs. Plant breeders use this basic funding to go out and find
                  more dollars for their programs.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Tom, your list of licensed Dealers that remit levy to the Alberta Barley Commission is no doubt accurate.
                    The problem for the ABC was that these people were NOT remitting the funds or portion thereof.

                    The ABC published an article not long ago trying to get these people to comply.

                    Without the power to audit the books, how could they even hope to acquire their DUE funds.

                    In a way its somewhat like the Mafia and their collection of "protection money" without the enforcers.

                    Any government that forces a group of people to contribute to a "special interest group" such as the ABC is in my view overstepping their authority to govern even if the provision is there to ask for a refund of these monies.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Why don't these same principles apply to the CWB and to be specific barley?

                      To ask the question again, how much barley money has been parked and used in the contingincy fund?

                      I note the CWB is a partner is many of the ABC projects (annual reports). Want level of accountability does the CWB have for these investments (albeit in partnership with ABC)?

                      Comment


                        #26
                        wilagro

                        Do you differentiate the method of collection/use of funds for Western Grain Research Foundation and Alberta Barley Commission? If you do, what makes WGRF different?

                        The question is specific to barley given WGRF collects wheat checkoffs for CWRS, CPS, durum in Alberta.

                        I think (hopefully someone will correct me if I am wrong) Alberta Winter Wheat Growers Commission and Alberta Soft Wheat Growers Commission collect from farmers as well and not WGRF.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          charlie: No difference...its all crooked.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Wilagro, you may be right as in no need for the ABC. What it will be called is the ACPC number 2! The Alberta Cereal Producers Commision and consolidate all 57 boards into 1 org.

                            Soon to follow the Canadian Cereals Council (CCC number 2)

                            ACPC number 1 can be the Alberta Oilseed Producers Commission.

                            confusing acronyms i know!

                            Comment


                              #29
                              wd is the king of master planners. Now tell us
                              what you have planned for land when u have
                              checkoffed every plant and seed hmmmm
                              ..........Checkoffs similar to APAS in Sask for a
                              farm organization,and extracted at the county
                              level? And all in the name of and for
                              "innovation"? Whats the limit for checkoffs? Or
                              is that to be decided by the folks smarter than
                              stupid farmer-funders? Pars

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Each farmer decide their own as they are refundable. Bad morning parsely?

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...