• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

proposed Alberta Wheat council Left meets Right

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Don't know the answer to your question. From my experience 5 years ago
    in the Ukraine, the issue was access to herbicides/other ag chemicals.
    The stuff that was being bought was older formulations manufactured in
    the Ukraine or more modern stuff from Europe.

    Would be an interesting question to look at cost/acre for chemicals or
    chemical cost/unit of production. Again, don't know the answer.

    I think where the new exporters have an advantage is on the fixed cost
    side. Lower land and labor costs. If I look at Canada, there are not
    massive differences in variable costs per acre among farmers. Where the
    big differences between operations lie is in fixed costs and debt. If your
    fixed costs and debt are high, then a farm needs to be at the top end of
    productivity with no room for weather glitches.

    Way off the topic of a wheat commission but perhaps the point is whether
    it is money well spent by farmers and from there, are systems in place to
    ensure value for farmer investors. An expense like all other expenses.

    Comment


      #22
      We are facing 90 dollars per acre fert.
      30 chem.
      40 to 50 machinery
      50 other
      I don't understand not having a mandatory 2 bucks minimum to develope new crop strains, markets etc. Just because farmers can claim back check off money does not insure accountability as farmers that claim back will do year after year anyway. no one should be allowed to claim this moneys back.

      Comment


        #23
        Charlie charlie charlie, you kinda sound enthused

        I smell subtlety Don't even try to instill research
        as the normal everyday farming expenses
        farmers should come to accept as routine
        accounting. ...... Set In our psyche so to speak.

        Nor follow up with a spiel on how farmers should
        be legally responsible for their own research and
        get dumped with the bills

        I'm feeling ornery. LOL. Pars

        Comment


          #24
          We all know the real work gets done by the staff hired for the organizations. By having less board members more staff could be utilized. If wheat is king, then which one? cwrs? cps? white? red? winter red? winter white? If there are so many wheats alone adding barley and oats shouldn't be that difficult. Goood leadership and policy make the commission guide the staff to accomplish goals whether 2 crops or 10. having 50 worker bee wanna be directors makes little sense today. Almost as archaic in concept as the cwb.

          Pars, graffiti with punctuation.

          Comment


            #25
            Good thing, then, I haven't had my blog up and
            running since 2009. Someone would be washing
            it. Pars

            Comment


              #26
              Hopper, I don't think all farmers should have an
              environmental fee slapped on them if they don't
              have some rotational forage... As EU is pushing.
              Nor should APAS be deducting a checkoff Nor
              should there be a U Of S farm accident
              newsletter Checkoff deduction on our tax notice

              If you want a checkoff... Don't assume I should
              be obligated to finance your hairbrained/genius
              ideas.
              Don't eye uP my purse cowboy. Jeez you'd think
              you'd recognize the principle you are overlooking.

              You drinkin rum? Pars

              Comment


                #27
                Why should farmers who pay r and d levies do
                so knowing full well all farmers will benefit from
                new technologies,varietys,disease resistance etc
                etc ,so those who don't pay get a free lunch.

                It really wasn't a issue here and if they decide
                grdc need more money they just increase the
                levy and it's basically never questioned.

                Private companies do a heap of r and here as
                well mostly along side grdc for extra credabilty

                Funny slot of you guys are pro collective
                marketing but not collective r & d

                Comment


                  #28
                  Parsley,

                  I agree with Hopper.

                  I agree with WD9.

                  Alberta Pulse Growers works with numerous crops... with the same administration same staff very well.

                  As does Grain Growers of Canada.

                  Co-operation happens on our farms every second of every day. The same farm... grows many different crops. Easily the same 'Council' would deal with multiple cereal crops.

                  As to us robbing yoour purse... I am sure you will find appropriate way to slap anyones hand that comes too close!

                  Grin <(>:{)

                  Your points are always provocative... and there for appreciated!!!

                  It is great to have all sides of the debate.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Oil industry pays royalties to mineral rights
                    holders, which includes, for example, farmers
                    and govt holders, but they do not collect research
                    checkoffs from the gov or farmer. The oil cos pay
                    for their own research. And pay the clean up

                    And of course, universities do their regular
                    research. Right now, universities don't get
                    enough cash because most gov funding goes to
                    biotech companies to match the farmer funding.

                    Ah, charlie, there's the rub.

                    The companies want every last red cent (and
                    why not if farmers are stupid enough) that both
                    gov'ts and farmers don't have!! Borrow more?
                    Borrowing money for endless funding is not the
                    farmers goal is it.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      I was mugged in Regina, Tom. He had his
                      designs on my purse; however, he was the one
                      who ended up running for the door, and yes, I
                      know when someone is eying up my purse. You
                      should keep your eye on yours. It's so heavy, you
                      forget, and think it's your heavy laptop.

                      Calculate your number of ag orgs... The number
                      of sucking directors, and their expenses, what
                      the number of govt staff being paid, and the
                      contracting costs. The latter wil groil your insides
                      Divide it by the number of farmers. And sit on the
                      toilet before you press "divide". Pars

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...