Ritz to table legislation end monopoly today

[parsley]

My life observations lead me to predict this:

1. No government will hand over control of
wheat; not even to corps.
2 Governments will continue to control farmers
through CWB legislation.
3. Too many people making their living from
agriculture view farmers as disorganized and
gullible. We are.
4 Don't trust the folks in agriculture you assume
will work in the interest of FARMERS. They
won't.
5. Farm families will continue to move to the city
and rural Canada will be isolate. The LPC stated
plan was to reduce the number of farmers and
farms. Key Liberals in agriculture desks in Ottawa continue to fulfill that vision.

Until the words " general advantage of Canada"
are removed from the present and future CWB
act and enabling Canada Grain Act, because
they free up the FARMER, as they say, darling, we're f#*€ed. Pars.

[wd9]

Its close enough for now.

[parsley]

Every grain elevator, ocean Terminal, seed
cleaning plant and feed mill remains deemed as
works for the general advantage of Canada

I'm not cool with continued legislated fascism by
a conservative government. That where we
differ. Pars

[parsley]

If any farmers believe that a Liberal, or NDP, or
Coalition govt., will change the 'general
advantage of Canada' designation, by legislation,
following an election, five years from now, is not
realistic. Pars

[wd9]

Fear mongering. If a future government wants to bring the whole CWB for all grains back they would just do it along with no land ownership too.

Parsely, why such a hard time with moving forward and why portraying only doom and gloom in almost every post? Its like you just wanna stand still and not invest or build or do anything. How come?

[mustardman]

wd9 it would be impossible for any gov't to bring cwb back without being sued bigtime by U.S corporations.

Just a little document called 'nafta'

[FarmRanger]

Bull$#/&

If that was the case they'd have sued a long time ago.

[wd9]

Trudeau made sure the government has ultimate if not even unaccountable power. They can do whatever they want.

[parsley]

I respect you enough wd to tell you as I see it

Discussing  meaning in the act  is not fear
mongering.

Sepals was asked if a courtcase could succeed
and he replied going to court = 50/50

I would have preferred an opinion I enjoy hearing
but i value candor 

I would love  if the Act presented was perfect. I
believe it has flaws. You want me to pretend?  
That is not who I am, wd

I would love if we had unlimited resources for
research. I happen to believe research is
invaluable, but Canada has overspent, grossly;  
it's time for head down, ass up and pay the fn
bills timeout. IMHO.  

I'm not anti-research; I'm for proceeding  
cautiously so that we have university  profs we
can afford to pay and students who can afford to
attend. 

The next two years  will decide whether your
lifestyle will end or continue, wd. IMHO

All of us learn the fiscal-stove is hot, in our own
way and time.  You have yet to locate  the stove.
The coals are soon burned out  Pars

[parsley]

That should be depape ... Courtcase