To remind the CWB that they lost their legal right
to spend your pooling money on backroom
monopoly plots:
On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court of
Canada dismissed an application from the CWB
for leave to appeal a ruling on the Government of
Canada's advocacy directive. No reasons were
provided. As a result, the directive - initially
issued in October 2006 - remains in force. It
prevents the CWB from spending money
"advocating retention of the CWB's monopoly
powers".
The Supreme ciur told the CWB to stop
promoting the single desk.
They are pissing on the court. And stealing your
money
Isn't it time to have a law firm send them a registered letter? Pars
to spend your pooling money on backroom
monopoly plots:
On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court of
Canada dismissed an application from the CWB
for leave to appeal a ruling on the Government of
Canada's advocacy directive. No reasons were
provided. As a result, the directive - initially
issued in October 2006 - remains in force. It
prevents the CWB from spending money
"advocating retention of the CWB's monopoly
powers".
The Supreme ciur told the CWB to stop
promoting the single desk.
They are pissing on the court. And stealing your
money
Isn't it time to have a law firm send them a registered letter? Pars
Comment