• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Strong Hands"

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    "Strong Hands"

    As the transition towards an open market
    system evolves, we’ve been hearing the
    comment more frequently about what a big
    deal it is that wheat will now be a
    ‘cash crop’. Indeed, being able to
    generate cash flow on demand from wheat
    will greatly improve individual
    producers’ ability to make good,
    successful grain marketing decisions.

    In the fall, many producers have often
    been forced to sell non-Board grains in
    order to generate cash to pay the bills,
    or because they’ve run out of bin space
    and there’s only been a 25% contract
    call on wheat. Being forced to sell
    crops when the market is signalling not
    to comes with a cost. That cost is equal
    to the price the farmer gets when they
    are forced to move it, compared to the
    higher price that comes available
    afterwards.

    It’s impossible to know exactly what
    price might have been achieved if the
    farm hadn’t been forced to sell at an
    inopportune time. Saying that fall is an
    inopportune time to sell further assumes
    that one’s forecast for the non-Board
    market to rise post-harvest was
    accurate.

    Much of the fear that farm prices will
    end up in the bottom end of the range
    without the CWB and mandatory pooling is
    unfounded. Market analysis works, and
    farmers have been investing in effective
    market research and opinions about
    future price direction for years. Even
    in wheat in recent years, forecasting
    price direction is the way farmers made
    decisions about whether to choose the
    CWB’s cash price (Fixed Price Contract)
    on a particular day, or to wait.

    They don’t always post the lows of the
    year in September, but canola, peas,
    oats and other non-Board markets do face
    seasonal price pressure in the fall. The
    vast majority of distress-type sales end
    up happening in the post-harvest period,
    sometimes due to the inability to move
    more wheat. Allowing crops to move off
    farms to market in this way is weak.
    Better prices are achieved by farms that
    hold their crop in strong hands.

    ‘Strong hands’ is a grain industry term
    that refers to the skill of buying and
    selling at the most opportune times.
    Through contact with other buyers and
    sellers, traders maintain a sense of how
    badly the market wants to own or get rid
    of grain stocks at any particular time,
    and responds by either offering or
    holding back their own market interest
    accordingly.

    To develop ‘strong hands’ will involve
    monitoring and sensing market tone on an
    ongoing basis, which will be new to some
    producers. But in all cases, it starts
    with removing restrictions from
    positioning the farm to sell according
    to market signals post-harvest. Next
    year, Prairie farms’ ability to get to
    this position will be greatly
    facilitated by the ability to use wheat
    as a cash crop.

    www.farmlinksolutions.ca

    #2
    Yeah, I can hear the cash registers going off. You can advise all growers how to sell at the right time.

    Comment


      #3
      There are farmers who managed good cash flow from wheat in the fall under the CWB. These are the ones who played the game of running multiple permit books. I know one farm that used all the combinations of people and managed to run 13 books allowing about 500 tonne to go in off the combine without any calls. The added bonus for them is they get multiple votes in director elections and so called plebisites. This helps explain how 18000 commercial farms can translate into 68000 ballots.

      Comment


        #4
        Just curious if you supported the introduction of CWB producer payment options. They were brought into play to address some of Brenda's concerns. I likely provided more advice to farmers on the use of CWB alternatives that open market crops because of their complexity and level of volatility in basis levels with no rhyme or reason.

        I suspect things will be a lot easier in the world. A price, a decision to deliver or not and paid in full if the decision is to deliver.

        Comment


          #5
          Wilagro market advisors were spending a lot of time teaching farmers how to figure out the complicated CWB programs. Their price for service should drop now, if we get better market signals and real world cash pricing opportunities. In fact they could be out of a job, lol.

          Comment


            #6
            Lots of things to work out moving ahead in the new world.

            Futures markets as reference points. New contract at ICE Winnipeg. Basis levels. Protein grids/values for other traits like falling number. All these have been hidden in the pooling system (has changed with producer payment options somewhat). If a farmer has used PPO products with some understanding, then they are in a good position to move ahead into the new world. Prices will reflect real sales activity - not a hedgeable relationship with the most recent PRO.

            Hopperbin - I forget whether you or someone but a question of use of futures markets or grain companies matching producer deliveries with sales as a way of managing risk. Likely to happen. Will note this is what happen with pulses (no futures or other ways to manage risk).

            Long and short, farmers will make sales/contracting decisions based on a real price. Their individual decision will be based on financial needs/profit targets, market outlook, etc.

            Comment


              #7
              Too far ahead but something many of you may have to thing about is tax consequences of an open market. Leaving price forecasts aside for this thread, you are more likely to be paid in full for wheat deliveries fall 2012. You may have too spend more time this coming year managing your income to prevent a massive tax bill in 2012. Not everyone but I suspect some of you will have to think about.

              Maybe a good arguement for single. Having to pay too much tax.

              Comment


                #8
                Aggie, it's quite sad that you put more faith in a parasitic bureaucracy than in your fellow citizens or even yourself for that matter. Why do you even post here? We all get it, you're a wheat board supporter but when asked to defend your belief with facts and info that will show where your coming from and why you believe what you do, it's crickets. Nothing but blither bather and negative jabs at the people who are trying to enrich themselves with knowledge and of course enrich themselves with money.

                The fact that others see all the positives that will flow from an open market seems to drive you (and others like you) batty. It's as if you believe you can only succeed and be happy if others are miserable. Not a great way to live in my opinion.

                So instead of always reacting by posting your childish drive by derisions, try listening to your fellow farmers and fellow citizens for a change, even you may learn something and be happier for it. Just a thought.

                Any who, good point brenda, this point alone will make farmers a whack load of wealth over the course of time. the other thing I expect is our varietal development and yield curve will start to rise big time, as now money will be invested in variety development with priorities for disease resistance, yield, standability (short straw) and the like instead of the llok of the kernel.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Better yet, I could just drive by my "big farmer" neighbour and watch to see when he is loading up wheat to "market" and follow his example.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Willy, I know some farmers who do just that. Not how I do it but it's a free country, at least it will be on Aug 1 2012. But why do you think only big farmers will get ahead?

                    It's been my observation that there's big and there's successful and one doesn't automatically follow the other.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      On the same point willy , just driving by your big farmer to see if he's "loading up" isn't really going to help you because if he's anything like me ( and most other farmers who understand how to market grain)the decision to sell would have been made months ago and contracted and priced for delivery at a much later date.

                      Loading up a truck of unpriced grain and expecting the best deal is NOT what a successful farmer would do.
                      C'mon willy this isn't 1932. The world and people have developed since then.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Could also sell and deliver on an instant. Like when the local mill runs out of grain paying more than good quality board wheat. Or when the local ellevator basis is cut for one day by 15 dollars. I believe Will would have missed these opportunities cause he hates everyone he delivers grain to.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Adam Smith

                          Well said.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Adam Smith

                            Well said.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Adam Smith

                              Well said.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...