• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Court challenge

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Court challenge

    Anyone going to Winnipeg to sit in the court room tomorrow?

    #2
    which court case is this one?

    Comment


      #3
      Am in Regina at opening of parliament. Five
      people attending the receptions laughed, saying
      when they watched C18 they wandered what
      Parsley was saying LOL. Lots of people I know
      attending. pars

      Comment


        #4
        Friends of CWB and the CWB vs the government of Canada.

        Comment


          #5
          Never been there , but were and what time is it ? Maybe try to get in to see it .
          Whats your predication,as to the out come ?

          Comment


            #6
            If a court interprets the law and parliament makes the law, if the law changes during a court case does the court then interpret that law?

            Seems he who makes the rules wins the game, but it would seem the outcome of the court case matters not, the law is changing. But maybe not. Can a court overturn a parliamentary voted in law?

            What would happen? Anyone with a law degree?

            Comment


              #7
              No law degree, but here is my interpretation. The
              judge must rule on the law currently in place. The new
              Bill has not yet been proclaimed so it is not yet law.
              However, the judge would have discretion to look at
              what is impending and could deny or suspend. So I'd
              say 50/50. If the new Act is proclaimed the Feds will
              have time to leave for appeal. At the end of the day,
              Parliament owns the deck. It could end up in the
              Supreme Court. Any other viewpoints?

              Comment


                #8
                Ritz didn't take wheat,durum or barley away from the cwb, they chose not to offer any further contracts.

                The cwb has not been denied to carry on business. Only Oberg has made that choice.

                Hopefully, any level headed judge would see it that way.

                Ritz doesn't need to ask to change the cwb from a non-voluntary entity to a voluntary one.

                Now if he was saying that the cwb could no longer deal in durum (which was never asked on the plebiscite either) that would be a different story.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Since the judge can rule either way as he or she sees fit, protestors showing up at the court house will have a big influence on the decision.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Unless the CWB is mentioned in our Constitution or Bill of Rights, we should be okay.
                    Judges do think they are "god" in some cases and desire to write laws for us low class citizens.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      And if the judge rules the wrong way as far as I am conserned his car should be plastered with eggs so bad that he or she needs to wipe the windows.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        If the judge rules the wrong way, how long could this delay our open market ?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          (j) to act as agent for or on behalf of any minister
                          or agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada in
                          respect of any operations that it may be directed
                          to carry out by the Governor in Council; and

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Directions to the Corporation
                            18. (1) The Governor in Council may, by order,
                            direct the Corporation with respect to the manner
                            in which any of its operations, powers and duties
                            under this Act shall be conducted, exercised or
                            performed.
                            Directors
                            (1.1) The directors shall cause the directions to
                            be implemented and, in so far as they act in
                            accordance with section 3.12, they are not
                            accountable for any consequences arising from
                            the implementation of the directions.
                            Best interests
                            (1.2) Compliance by the Corporation with
                            directions is deemed to be in the best interests of
                            the Corporation.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Could court delays alter Aug 2012 freedom day?

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...