And if the judge rules the wrong way as far as I am conserned his car should be plastered with eggs so bad that he or she needs to wipe the windows.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Court challenge
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Directions to the Corporation
18. (1) The Governor in Council may, by order,
direct the Corporation with respect to the manner
in which any of its operations, powers and duties
under this Act shall be conducted, exercised or
performed.
Directors
(1.1)Â The directors shall cause the directions to
be implemented and, in so far as they act in
accordance with section 3.12, they are not
accountable for any consequences arising from
the implementation of the directions.
Best interests
(1.2)Â Compliance by the Corporation with
directions is deemed to be in the best interests of
the Corporation.
Comment
-
-
Hopper, maybe a few hundred signed letters to
the court, asking for the judges resignation from
the bench IF he hasn't read the Minister's rights,
which I posted above, should help prevent a
renegade judge from getting promoted to a
higher bench. At the least. Pars.
Comment
-
However, the Interpretation Act, which deals with amending and repealing statutes says an ammendment to an Act cannot change the intent of the existing ACT: "...except in so far as the provision is inconsistent with the intent and object of such Act, or the interpretation which such provision would give to any word, expression or clause is inconsistent with the context..."
If the judge believes the amendments made are at odds with the Intent of the the original CWB Act he has no choice but to rule against the government tommorrow.
Comment
-
DML,
It would be a consitutional crisis if one Parliament can bind the next parliament from passing legislation.
A 100 percent approval or consensus vote against a particular Legislative Act could easily be enacted... stopping future changes to Statutes.
This would bring Parliament and the democratic system into disrepute if your view were enforced by the courts.
Comment
-
Seems appropriate for this to be in Winnipeg; same place where the Hudsons Bay Fur Monopoly was upheld and overturned in the same day. The judge ruled: guilty of illegally trading furs in the then monopoly trading district controled by the HBC. Guillaume Sayer, had broken the law; the rule of day meant the monopoly was broken. From day forward the law remained but the trade was open.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment