• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Court challenge

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    And if the judge rules the wrong way as far as I am conserned his car should be plastered with eggs so bad that he or she needs to wipe the windows.

    Comment


      #12
      If the judge rules the wrong way, how long could this delay our open market ?

      Comment


        #13
        (j) to act as agent for or on behalf of any minister
        or agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada in
        respect of any operations that it may be directed
        to carry out by the Governor in Council; and

        Comment


          #14
          Directions to the Corporation
          18. (1) The Governor in Council may, by order,
          direct the Corporation with respect to the manner
          in which any of its operations, powers and duties
          under this Act shall be conducted, exercised or
          performed.
          Directors
          (1.1) The directors shall cause the directions to
          be implemented and, in so far as they act in
          accordance with section 3.12, they are not
          accountable for any consequences arising from
          the implementation of the directions.
          Best interests
          (1.2) Compliance by the Corporation with
          directions is deemed to be in the best interests of
          the Corporation.

          Comment


            #15
            Could court delays alter Aug 2012 freedom day?

            Comment


              #16
              Hopper, maybe a few hundred signed letters to
              the court, asking for the judges resignation from
              the bench IF he hasn't read the Minister's rights,
              which I posted above, should help prevent a
              renegade judge from getting promoted to a
              higher bench. At the least. Pars.

              Comment


                #17
                Go hard Pars I got a farm audit in the morning.

                Comment


                  #18
                  However, the Interpretation Act, which deals with amending and repealing statutes says an ammendment to an Act cannot change the intent of the existing ACT: "...except in so far as the provision is inconsistent with the intent and object of such Act, or the interpretation which such provision would give to any word, expression or clause is inconsistent with the context..."
                  If the judge believes the amendments made are at odds with the Intent of the the original CWB Act he has no choice but to rule against the government tommorrow.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    DML,

                    It would be a consitutional crisis if one Parliament can bind the next parliament from passing legislation.

                    A 100 percent approval or consensus vote against a particular Legislative Act could easily be enacted... stopping future changes to Statutes.

                    This would bring Parliament and the democratic system into disrepute if your view were enforced by the courts.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Seems appropriate for this to be in Winnipeg; same place where the Hudsons Bay Fur Monopoly was upheld and overturned in the same day. The judge ruled: guilty of illegally trading furs in the then monopoly trading district controled by the HBC. Guillaume Sayer, had broken the law; the rule of day meant the monopoly was broken. From day forward the law remained but the trade was open.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...