Cpallett, the shortfall of your argument is that Justice Campbell is human, with prejudices, pride and other human failings. Thus the need for an appeal court, providing regress and protection for all petitioners.
You also haven't allowed for the fact that in the adversarial theater of open court some lawyers fail to present their case well enough.
In this case, if Justice Campbell thought there has not been enough consultation he must be living under a rock. It has been the most polled issue ever in ag.
errare humanum est
You also haven't allowed for the fact that in the adversarial theater of open court some lawyers fail to present their case well enough.
In this case, if Justice Campbell thought there has not been enough consultation he must be living under a rock. It has been the most polled issue ever in ag.
errare humanum est
Comment