• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CWB Bill C18 to be proclaimed before Jan 1 2012

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #13
    The Bullyies vow to continue, bullying.
    I thought Comedia had a law against
    bullying, just like it has a gun
    registration act, weather you like it or
    not. Blind, leading the blind to the
    alter of sackrifice. Chislers and
    marketeers these duds certainly are!!!
    Employ any tactic, do anything, pout,
    shout, swear, dare, find commies
    everywhere.......... Their motto,
    shoot, shovel, and shut up.
    Teabaggers to the end.......

    Comment


      #14
      there will be no vote because ritz knows he could not win a vote

      Comment


        #15
        Burbert,

        I see you looked in the mirror and reported what you saw!

        Very accurate!

        You must be watching CBC the $1.1B worth of dollar law breakers!

        Comment


          #16
          Stubble,

          THere will be a vote... but with our trucks not with our pens!

          The way it should have been since 1998... Goodales revenge will end!

          You do have or can hire a truck... you could even vote to deliver Canola and Pulses... if you would like to expand your horizons!!!

          Comment


            #17
            Would the Canadian Western Barley Growers
            Associatio be willing to write a letter to Rhe Law
            Society voicing concerns about this judge' s
            decision? And if they would, would you sign it?

            Send a message. Pars.

            Comment


              #18
              Soooooo,the senate cant kill this?

              Issue a statement saying,"in light of resent events..."

              I know the senate doesn't oppose much but?

              Comment


                #19
                Stuuble - if a vote is needed it will happen. Simple question :
                Would you support a volentary CWB - yes or no ?
                Only active farmers eligable - no retired farmers or landlords. All farmers with 160 ac or more regardless if they have/had a permit book or not.
                This would eliminate much of the b/s votes. One step further would be a weighted vote based on tons produced, but it would not be nessesary if only active farmers were alowed to vote. It would be 70% yes 30% no.
                Fire away on comments....

                Comment


                  #20
                  I wished you felt you owned your grain so you
                  didn't feel this need to vote on whether you can
                  sell it or not.

                  How about your testicles. Do you own them?
                  Nothing personal. Just asking about body
                  property Pars.

                  Comment


                    #21
                    But we don't need a vote about my
                    property. Hey Stubble, let's have a vote.
                    You, me and ten homeless guys are going to
                    vote on who gets to sleep with your wife.
                    I think bachelor number three isn't THAT
                    hairy and looks like he had a bath last
                    week... I think I'm going to go with
                    him... Who are you voting for? C'mon isn't
                    that democratic enough for you?

                    Comment


                      #22
                      Think we should have a vote. Then the CWB can spend another few million to do town hall meeting and full page ads in all the media. Those who oppose the board will not sit idlely by this time. The board has no hope of winning the barley vote and borderline on wheat. If it comes to that I will be lobbying loudly for a vote to remove my province from the designated area. Would think there is enough precedence for this.

                      Comment


                        #23
                        Furrow, 160 acres is too small to me, and I am a small farmer. I think VIABLE farms should have a vote if it came to that. To me that would mean 640 acres. That should weed out the fly by night, Tax issue farmers, who really do not depend on the farm for aliving. Unless you depend on your farm to make a living, why should you vote against my right. I farm for aliving. It is all the farm, no wife who is a teacher or nurse, no inheritance, no fancy schmancy stuff.

                        If it came to a vote being necessary,(thankfully it won't), only farmers with a vested interest should vote. For me, this excludes anyone with less than 640 or 800 acres...

                        Not 160, jmo.

                        Comment


                          #24
                          Agree 100%, I was just throwin out numbers. Anything is better than the b/s they have been doing.

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...