Have been thinking about 47.1 and as I recall this little gem exists because in 1996 the Western Grain Marketing Panel recommended to Goodale to free up feed barley and unlicensed varieties of wheat. The cwb made a huge to do about giving up something they really didn't give a crap about.
So in order to address the cwb's concerns about cherry picking certain types or kinds or classes of grains and taking out of the cwb's exclusive jurisdiction, Ralphie came up with 47.1.
The intent of this clause was to prevent durum or feed barley or winter wheat being removed from the cwb or as oat had already been while the single desk structure for all other wheat or barley remain intact.
It was never intended to prevent the cwb act from being repealed without a vote.
Am I missing something here?
If this has been discussed already , I'm sorry, I guess I've missed it.
Did the feds lawyers make this point?
So in order to address the cwb's concerns about cherry picking certain types or kinds or classes of grains and taking out of the cwb's exclusive jurisdiction, Ralphie came up with 47.1.
The intent of this clause was to prevent durum or feed barley or winter wheat being removed from the cwb or as oat had already been while the single desk structure for all other wheat or barley remain intact.
It was never intended to prevent the cwb act from being repealed without a vote.
Am I missing something here?
If this has been discussed already , I'm sorry, I guess I've missed it.
Did the feds lawyers make this point?
Comment