Wilagro, experience shows that such enterprises usually fail. Farmer directors usually try to mold the enterprise to strongly enhance THE FARM at the expense of the sustainably of the enterprise they direct.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Merchant law suit
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
-
Good fer Comedian framers. Finally a show
of guts fer a change. Here's hopin we all
get a big cheque, from the nationalizing,
sobs. We's getting lean and mean just
like our southern neighbours, let the
Courts decide what is true and correct.
Not a bunch of hillwilliam, suckholing
politicos, tryin ta please the chiseling
marketeering lobby........
Comment
-
No more argrinvest
No more agristability
No more tax reform
No more gst exemptions
No more fuel tax rebates
More fertilizer taxes
More income taxes
On and On
If you want a war Im sure you will get one.
Comment
-
Tony Merchant is a blood sucker, the residential school debacle landed him some sweet pay. He always takes his share first then your left with the leftovers. Cant believe all you lefty pinkos love the idea of a U.S. style lawsuit.
Ritz can keep my money if its from the CWB, I dont want it or its leftovers.
Comment
-
OK Wilagro,
Who had a decent year in the farm supply/grain handling business... that counts on direct elected farmers to direct the future of their business?
UFA?
CWB?
SWP-gone;
AWP-gone;
MPE-gone;
UGG-gone;
Federated Co-op is a food, fuel, hardware, farm supply merchandising business... whom I wouldn't mind the new CWB selling out to!
Is that your idea Wilagro???
Why didn't Oberg and his crazy 7 buddies start transition years ago?
Federated proves no 'single desk' is needed to be a sucessful marketer!!!
Comment
-
This class action appears to be premature at best, and a complete waste of time and energy at worst.
Not only is the CWB continued (read alive and well) under the new Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act, but the Act also provides for the distribution of assets should the CWB be wound up.
Tough to argue that the manner of distribution of assets is unfair and/or illegal when those assets haven't been distributed yet and continue to be in the posession of a working CWB. Which, of course, makes it well nigh impossible to argue that Canadian farmers have lost the 'benefits' of having the CWB when the CWB is still alive and well (albeit with new management).
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment