• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Organics not safer

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    sliverback: Organic or orgasmic wheat or regular wheat has gluten which can't be tolerated by celiacs so there is no difference as to how they feel after ingesting it. I can tolerate some gluten but not too much or I get diarrhea. Products using rice flour are okay.

    I doubt that ANY organic farmer claims that his organically grown wheat can be tolerated by those suffering from celiac disease.

    Comment


      #12
      Parsely, canola isn't healthy, we just keep saying it is. Its healthier than butter yes, but it still is just fat that comes in a bottle instead of a stick. I think we forget that too easily.

      Comment


        #13
        There is no way canola is healthier than butter,minus
        possible biomagnification problems.

        A price will have to be paid one way or another for
        the chemicals we use.

        One dumb question.

        Every once in a while i hear about vegetable seeds
        that we buy for our gardens being genetically
        modified and that their next generation of seeds
        won't grow well or they terminate all together.

        Is this true?

        Comment


          #14
          Technically everything we grow is organic.

          Comment


            #15
            I'll poke the bruin.

            Organics are not an industry, they are a religion. Governed by superstition and myth. The religion will fill you full of anecdotal stories about the horrors hidden in non-organic food, but when the myths are tested they always turn out to be just that, myths.

            High priestess..err...I mean Parsey, where is the replicable evidence for these outlandish organic gospels?

            Comment


              #16
              Parsley, demand has been growing by 50-100% a year
              over the last 6 years or so both for grass-fed beef
              and our pasture pork. The consumer is driving this
              demand and producers are way behind supplying
              their demand. Too busy as "an industry" trying to
              force hormone treated beef on the Europeans.

              Comment


                #17
                There is no doubt that the organic industry has successfully promoted itself; and is growing. Whether the claimed health benefits are in any way valid has not been proven to me. If the world is to rely on only organic food supplies then the world should/must do something about a seven billion plus population. And the pricing schedule of organic farm producers is not friendly to decreasing even current starvation rates.
                I would suggest that everyone eat a varied sensible diet; and all in moderation. On average there probably is no health benefit to eating labelled organic food compared non poisoned food from any grocery store.
                And remember that unless you live your whole life in a controlled environmental chamber; never eat at a restaurant, fowl supper or the neighbors, distill every drop of water etc. then you will ingest, inhale or absorb those same "poisons" you blame every illness on.
                Few people will ever live to be a hundred; and organic food will have zero correlation with longevity.

                Comment


                  #18
                  The most important issue with organics is not if you are able to keep up with demand, are more or less successful financially as a producer, or have successfully promoted your products.

                  Anecdotal testimonials and sweeping claims of health benefits and cures have always been embraced by sufferers and those concerned or afraid of the future. To have little solid proof of those claims and especially the overall benefits, shouldn't impress even the minority who are really only concerned with their own mortality.
                  Where are the statistics of fewer doctor/chiropracter/nutritionist visits, less work days lost, longer life, significantly less sickness, no dietary supplements required and other measures of quality of life improvements?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    I would never begrudge someone for wanting to live a healthier lifestyle. The sad part is, like oneoff stated, unless you live in a bubble our environment is polluted to the point that escaping is impossible. But if someone wants to lessen their exposure in anyway they can that is their business. I don't think it is fair to just blame to primary production of the food as being the culprit, what about all the processing that is done to it. Unfortunately, if the whole world went organic, I think it would mean more hungry people. I've said the human race is the cancer of the earth!!
                    ps--I am not an organic producer.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Coleville,I agree that for a segment of organics, it
                      is a religion, or a left-wing ideology. Organics has
                      also been hijacked by the climate-change
                      quackeries to advance carbon taxation worldwide.
                      Actually, Cole, even though we dont, I'm not
                      totally adverse to spot spraying. Nor some
                      fertilizer application. And I really believe most
                      farmers are not adverse to looking to lessen spray
                      and fertilizer.
                      But it's important tnat ALL farmers recognize
                      there is a growing health problem i first noticed it
                      beginning with peanut allergies popping up out of
                      the blue.

                      1. Should we acknowledge there is a problem or
                      pretend it does not exist? There have been many
                      cases of cancer with my friends and family, so my
                      experience is anecdotal, indeed, but their funerals
                      are not. Doctors tell them to change their eating
                      habits. Hospitals have nutritionists on staff. Why?

                      2. Should we try and see if allergies are directly
                      related to the food we produce, or should we
                      pretend it has nothing to do with the food we
                      produce? Consumers think so. The alternate is to
                      to lose market share to replacement foods where
                      eaters buy rice flour instead of wheat flour. We
                      lose market share , don't we. Or we we end up
                      buying baquettes in the superstore made from
                      ingredients made in France, not anecdotal, but
                      plainly visible on the labels. We lose market
                      share, don't we.

                      We have a problem, don't we.

                      Now you can be angry with me, with organics, or
                      with conventionals, but all of us want to increase
                      market share. Can we agree alll of us would like
                      1.3B Chinese eating toast in the morning instead
                      of rice.
                      Instead, I see my next door neighbors buying rice
                      flour.

                      I think we need to look problems in the eye. And I
                      see a problem. Do you? Parsley

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...