Burbert: go back to the first post in this thread.
That is what the discussion is about. WE don't have
a clue whether or not these lines are required
because there has not been an open public hearing
process through the EUB to determine the need and
the cost allocation. What we do know is that both
Atco and Altalink have their hooks into the PCs big
time and what we do know is that we consumers
will pay the shot for construction costs and the two
above mentioned culprits get the lines handed to
them and we do know that your property rights
have been expropriated by cabinet to make this all
happen. I have read the Wildrose Policy and while
parts of their philosophy creep me out, parts of
their platform are far superior to "the devil we
know" which has become completely out of control
and governed by hubris. In my riding, it's an easy
call. The Wildrose challenger is a far superior
candidate to the sitting (cow patty) incumbent. If
nothing else, a powerful opposition would be a hell
of an improvement.
That is what the discussion is about. WE don't have
a clue whether or not these lines are required
because there has not been an open public hearing
process through the EUB to determine the need and
the cost allocation. What we do know is that both
Atco and Altalink have their hooks into the PCs big
time and what we do know is that we consumers
will pay the shot for construction costs and the two
above mentioned culprits get the lines handed to
them and we do know that your property rights
have been expropriated by cabinet to make this all
happen. I have read the Wildrose Policy and while
parts of their philosophy creep me out, parts of
their platform are far superior to "the devil we
know" which has become completely out of control
and governed by hubris. In my riding, it's an easy
call. The Wildrose challenger is a far superior
candidate to the sitting (cow patty) incumbent. If
nothing else, a powerful opposition would be a hell
of an improvement.
Comment