• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Some one Explain the Pike management Land shares!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    What still ps me in all this is no one got a chance
    up until last fall the guy who sold was a fierce
    competitor.
    But all this foreign ownership by outsiders is bs.
    Why do we want to o back to what our
    grandfathers left.
    Signed frustrated in Saskatchewan!

    Comment


      #52
      Right on Lakenheath, skfarmer3 and others. Let's get at this I'm all in.

      Comment


        #53
        So guys, the previous purchases of land by larger and larger farmers in the area are ok. Now that it is outsiders driving the bus we want to stop foriegn investment. Or, from what i can tell, investment from other people then local people.

        SF3-looks like you did not cultivate you neighbors properly and may want to look in mirror for the answer as to why the neighbor did not come to you. They guy got his price, give it a rest.

        We want capitalism except for food security then we want socialism. What so we can grow 5 million MT of durum for 30 million people. Give me a break. Grow 2 million MT of lentils for a country that consumes 5000 MT?? Food security, thats a good one.

        I am all Canadian all the time, but face it, we have been here 100 years. I have history here as well. Our farm turned 100 last year. Don't want to see the change but laugh when people figure it's ok to drive farm size by local and not by something unlocal. If we all cared about community size, etc we would be seeding with 24 feet of dicser.

        Comment


          #54
          THere seems to be a feeling that their is a God given right to farm? Is that the case? Some kind of ancestreal right that is bequethed only to those genetically related to farmers? Sorry, but this one kills me.

          Comment


            #55
            How would we define a farmer? Would their parents have to have made at least 50% of their income from primary agriculture? That would then allow access to cheap land. How do stop Hutterites in this process? What about First Nations? would they be allowed or the fact that havent "farmed" in the last 100 years (who cares about what happened prior to this massive time period of 100 years) would not allow them to purchase land in the new scheme.

            Some of this stuff must be in the NDP manifesto, surely we could use that as a guide.

            Comment


              #56
              Confusicious say

              "karefu wha u wiss fo"

              Maybe when libtards gain power and national energy
              program part deux includes resource revenues from
              farms.

              Which is an infringement on property rights also.

              Comment


                #57
                Dave, I get your point to a large
                extent. Regarding whether it matters who
                is buying the land, there is always some
                fella who thinks he can afford higher
                prices than the next guy. He can be
                purple, from Iceland, or he can be the
                longtime neighbors spoiled brat, riding
                pappy's shirtails. Regardless, these
                types are the ones making it hard for
                younger guys to get rolling. There are
                some in every area, who just have a
                thing for being huge. Great, fine, but
                regardless of where they are from, they
                are the ones making it tough for those
                starting out.

                I mean, SF3, said he was willing to buy
                a few more, at elevated prices, and more
                power to him. But for the ones like him
                where 200 000 for a quarter is pocket
                change, easy cash flow, well I dunno.
                It's a free country.

                As far as outsiders, I am still
                pondering... lol

                Comment


                  #58
                  I agree with what you are saying Freewheat, i feel similar, but you just could not set out to write stuff like this.

                  The idea is that we want to get rid of the CWB so we have control over our right to market our own product (which i agree with) and we want government to stay out of our way but we want government to intervene and prevent outsiders from coming into the industry. Freedom to sell our goods to any country for any price yet we want to prevent access to the industry to keep our personal access to the industry cheap. We want an open market that can drive the value of production up, but a closed market to keep land values down. Then, I assume, when we turn 65 we want it to turn around and go back to the way it was because if history has proved anything, it is that there are fewer and fewer people who want to farm. Lol. Thanks, I have not had this much fun since the CWB fell.

                  Comment


                    #59
                    You are a borderline comedian Dave. U liken an
                    aggressively expanding Saskatchewan farmer to
                    a foreign investor. You must be smoking
                    something awfully good. Billion dollar funds vs an
                    aggressive, hardworking, risk taking, getting down
                    and dirty SK farmer who has paid his dues. Give
                    me a break.

                    I hope u are having so much fun with this. U
                    single handily dismantled the CWB on Agriville
                    with your superior debating power, intellect and
                    knowledge of things should be. This
                    landownership debate is just a walk in park for u
                    and us donkeys that don't like what is going on
                    are just blinded, backwards fundamentalists
                    grasping on to the good ole days.

                    Get off your high horse and open your eyes.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Food security isn't solely defined by the fact that
                      Canadians don't consume all the durum and
                      lentils we grow. Does PEI consume all the
                      potatoes they grow.......he'll no. But their Govnt. Is
                      there to protect their interests. Govnt. Can, if u
                      didn't realize, play a role in the live of Canadians
                      and Canadian farmers.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...