• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AB Wildrose Projected at 56 seats...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    AB Wildrose Projected at 56 seats...

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Po4WxJXD_No/T4eqyvNtapI/AAAAAAAAH08/xYlR6fPsKMY/s1600/Full Projection.PNG

    Very good article:

    Monday, April 16, 2012

    Pre-debate, Wildrose still well ahead



    In the run-up to Thursday's leaders' debate, Wildrose widened its lead over the Progressive Conservatives, who in turn wiped the Liberals off the electoral map.

    For a comparison of how things have shifted over the last two weeks, take a look at my article for The Globe and Mail here.



    The projection was last updated in the early hours of Apr. 13, and since the previous projection of Apr. 11 the Wildrose have picked up one point to lead with 41.9%. This is the high watermark of the campaign for Danielle Smith.

    The Tories, meanwhile, have dropped 0.2 points to 33.2%, almost nine points behind Wildrose.

    The Liberals are down 0.1 point to 11% support, while the New Democrats are unchanged at 10.8%. For the Liberals, this is their lowest level of support in the campaign.

    The net result is that Wildrose is unchanged at a projected haul of 56 seats, while the Progressive Conservatives are up one seat to 27. This has come at the expense of the Liberals, who are now projected to win zero seats. The New Democrats have held steady at four seats.

    The likely range of Wildrose support has increased to between 36.6% and 47.1%, while the Tories are holding generally steady at between 30.5% and 35.9%. The two parties had overlapped since the Apr. 10 projection, but no more.

    The Liberals sit between 9.6% and 12.5%, narrowly ahead of the New Democrats, who are projected to take between 9.1% and 12.4% of the vote.


    This puts the likely range for the Liberals at between zero and three seats, while the New Democrats stand to win between two and eight sits. There is a very strong likelihood that the NDP will emerge as the third party in the legislature ahead of the Liberals, who may not sit at all.

    Wildrose should win between 30 and 74 seats, a range that puts the odds of a Wildrose majority strongly in their favour. The Tories stand between eight and 55 seats, which makes a PC win plausible but nevertheless unlikely.








    Edmonton vote projections

    The one region of the province keeping them in the game is Edmonton, where the Progressive Conservatives gained 1.8 points since Apr. 11. They now lead with 38.7% and have gained one seat. Wildrose is down 1.9 points to 27.3%, while the New Democrats are up 1.8 points to 16.4%.

    The Liberals have dropped 0.8 points to 13.9%, shutting them out seat-wise. Though they could still potentially win three seats in the capital and take 16.9% of the vote, they are being squeezed out by the other three parties. This has been going on since Apr. 5.

    The Alberta Party is down 0.7 points to 2.3%. Also note that the projection was updated to accurately reflect where candidates for the Alberta, Evergreen, and other parties are running. This has had the effect of boosting support for these parties in each riding (i.e., a party at 5% in a region with two ridings would have 5% in each, if they only run one candidate they would need to have 10% in that one riding).

    In Calgary, Wildrose is up 1.5 points and two seats to 47.8% and 26 seats. They also have it within their power to sweep the city, though as many as seven Tories could survive the onslaught. The PCs are down 1.8 points to 30.5%, while the Liberals are up 1.5 points to 11.6% and the NDP down 0.2 points to 7.2%. Though this is one bit of good news for the Liberals, they are far from being within range of a single seat in the city.

    In the rest of the province, Wildrose has taken a step back from its high and is down 2.3 points to 50.2% support. This has cost them two seats in the region, both going to the Tories. They are up 0.8 points to 30.7%. The Liberals ( 0.1) and Alberta Party (-0.1) are virtually unchanged at 7.2% and 2%, respectively. The New Democrats, however, are up 1.5 points to 8% and could even win as much as 11% of the vote and one seat outside the two cities.

    The three polls added to the projection all tell somewhat different stories, one of the reasons why the likely seat and vote ranges are so wide.

    ThinkHQ (Apr. 9-10, 1,223 surveyed) has Wildrose steady at 43% since their Apr. 2-3 poll, while the Tories are down one to 29% support. They generally have the parties holding firm throughout the province, though they see the parties neck-and-neck in Edmonton. Interestingly, however, ThinkHQ records that the personal impression of Wildrose has dropped significantly in the last week in Edmonton.

    Abacus Data (Apr. 9-11, 900 surveyed) puts Wildrose up three points since their Apr. 2-4 poll to 46%, while the Tories are down two to 29%. They show big Wildrose gains in Calgary and a big PC drop in the rest of Alberta, while giving the Tories a seven point (and increasing) edge in Edmonton.

    Finally, Campaign Research (Apr. 11, 894 surveyed) has Wildrose down 2.7 points since their Apr. 3 poll to 42.8%, while the Tories are up six points to 34.4% support. They show general stability in Calgary and the rest of Alberta, but a big Tory leap in Edmonton, where they hold a 22-point lead over Wildrose.

    If there is a trend to be seen in these polls, it is that the fortunes are improving for the Progressive Conservatives in Edmonton, but that they trail by significant (insurmountable?) margins in Calgary and the rest of Alberta. This is, of course, reflected in the projection.

    Did the debate change anything? What about Peter Lougheed's public endorsement of Alison Redford? We shall soon find out. A poll by Return on Insight out today shows a somewhat closer race between the Tories and Wildrose, however the firm had no other poll out during the campaign with which to compare trends. But with such a wide gap between the two frontrunners, the best Redford might be able to hope for is a minority - headed by Danielle Smith.

    http://threehundredeight.blogspot.ca/

    #2
    And now Redford thinks Pastors should have no say in what they believe to be moral and right. She assumes all
    Albertans are pro Gay. Me thinks she assumes wrong...

    Comment


      #3
      Tom, what are your thoughts about P. Lougheed coming out in support of the PC's? Do you think he still has sway? Would many younger than 50yrs old, remember or even find him relevant to this election?

      Comment


        #4
        The attack on Klein has backfired. It is hard to believe REDford can be trusted on anything she says.

        Sun News and Rutherford both have well exposed the 'shallow' nature of REDfords recent remarks on healthcare and issues of conscience.

        APril 23 will be a VERY interesting day for Alberta! The P.C.'s risk everything to fight back to being the Minority Opposition Party...

        PM Kim CampBell's defeat comes to mind...

        Comment


          #5
          Tom...I can't support the Wildrose Party as long as those old PC fossils such as Ernie Isley are influencing policy.

          When his own electorate voted against him it didn't dissuade him...he hung around the PC Party like a homesick dog for awhile and then hopped over to the Wildrose Party.

          He was probably one of the worst Ag ministers that Helberta ever had and I was glad to see him out of that portfolio.

          Lets hope that the Wildrose Party does not heed his counsel should they ever get elected to govern us.

          Comment


            #6
            So one old PC back roomer will keep you from voting WR yet the back room of the PC's is still full of PC back roomers.

            Comment


              #7
              per: I'm voting Liberal. We have a young lady running in our riding and while they may not get elected the Liberals have a pretty good platform which I can support.

              Comment


                #8
                wilagro: It is a good thing to vote how you believe! I have never had a problem with people voting how they feel.......even though I am working for the WRP!
                The way I see it is: I don't know everything. Others see things different than I do, and I defend their right to vote how ever they see fit? That's democracy!

                Comment


                  #9
                  I am good with that as well. You can even say what ever you want and think how you like. I have a few friends who intend to spoil their ballots.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    How important is the last week in a campaign?

                    Really, really important. Important enough to make the difference — in Alberta, and anywhere else.

                    Lots of Canadians are now watching the dramatic Alberta contest, now entering the home stretch. Non-Albertans can’t vote in the election, but they, too, have a stake in the outcome. That’s because the far-right Wildrose Alliance has been leading in the polls, and has an excellent shot at forming the government.

                    If they do so, Wildrose will be the most socially conservative government Canada has seen since the days of Social Credit in Alberta and the Union Nationale in Quebec. A Wildrose government will shatter decades of social and economic peace like the Socreds did. Canada doesn’t need that.

                    Over the weekend, the ugly face of Wildrose — an ugliness leader Danielle Smith has frantically attempted to hide from voters — revealed itself. Edmonton Southwest Wild-rose candidate Allan Hunsperger wrote on his website that public education is “Godless.” He also wrote that gays and lesbians are going to burn in Hell.

                    Said Hunsperger: “(If gays don’t change their ways, they) will suffer the rest of eternity in the lake of fire, Hell, a place of eternal suffering.”

                    When asked about Hunsperger’s words, Smith didn’t condemn him. Instead — incredibly — she defended what he said.

                    Harper’s Team is a terrific book about the Conservative Party’s 2004 campaign. It was written by Conservative party campaign manager Tom Flanagan. In it, Flanagan recalls an outburst by B.C. Conservative MP Randy White, who said “to heck with the courts,” adding that a Conservative government would use the notwithstanding clause to stop gay marriage. Flanagan wrote that White’s comments, which came in the final days of the 2004 campaign, were “enormously damaging” to Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s party.

                    “The interview was perfect for the Liberals because it seemed to show that Harper really did have a hidden agenda; his carefully crafted positions on abortion, gay marriage, and perhaps other issues, were just for show, and the real Harper would come out of the box if he won the election,” Flanagan wrote.

                    “It was a powerful message to take into the final weekend when, traditionally, about 25% of voters make up their minds.”

                    The issue here isn’t that Wildrose is intolerant. Many Albertans know they are, or at least suspect they are. The issue is that Smith and her Wildrose kooks have revealed themselves to be untested and untried, and therefore unfit for government. Speaking as someone whose family has lived in Alberta for decades, what attracted us to the place was stability. With successive governments that were socially progressive and fiscally conservative, Alberta has become an economic superpower. It didn’t favour radical policies, and benefited from that.

                    Wildrose are radicals. They are revolutionaries. They are bursting at the seams with knuckle-draggers like Allan Hunsperger, but they don’t want anyone to notice.

                    It’s time they noticed. In the final week, as Tom Flanagan wrote, many votes can and will move around. They should — away from Smith’s radicals.

                    Oh, and what’s Flanagan doing now?

                    He’s managing the Wildrose campaign.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Kinsella is getting a bit of ink today huh Stubble...


                      Jean Chrétien is still promoting the idea of Liberals and New Democrats merging into one federal party, despite strong objections to the NDP’s approach to Quebec independence.

                      In an interview Monday, the former Liberal prime minister dismissed suggestions that a merger now – when the Liberals have been reduced to a third-party rump and New Democrats are on the rise – would amount to an NDP takeover of his once-mighty party.

                      Mr. Chrétien said the shape of a new political entity would not be determined by the number of seats each party holds but by the respective strength of their ideas.

                      “In a new party, this [numbers game] does not matter any more. It's intellectual capacity that will make the difference,” he told The Canadian Press.

                      On that score, Mr. Chrétien expressed confidence the Liberals would hold their own in any merger negotiations and that their predominantly centrist viewpoint would prevail.

                      “I'm sure,” he said categorically. “The result of a situation like that is you would have a new party that would be a centrist party.”
                      ___________________________________

                      Comment


                        #12
                        true conservative weber. when you don't like the truth blame something on the liberals

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I hope you are signing all your wheat up with your beloved...at discounts... just like it always has been.

                          They have to be making ya proud...eh

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Come on Lweb, they're not discounts if
                            they don't tell you about them. Its just
                            theft.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              This whole gay marriage thing is a red herring.Hunsperger is just one unelected candidate.......Redfords Finance minister, Ted Morton, actually tried to get legisletion passed banning gay marriage?
                              No one has to vote for the Wildrose. You can vote for the totally corrupt PC party......or you can vote for the Liberals, NDP, or Alberta party......which is the same as voting for nothing....because nothing will change! On April 23rd you can be so happy you voted your conscience.....as Alison Redford continues to take your land and your democratic rights!
                              It is too bad some people can't get past the "scary" Wildrose. If they would read the WRP policies they just might realize the "scary" part is really nothing but PC (and other liberals)fearmongering!
                              But don't let facts get in the way of your pre-concieved notions......If it is free enterprize it must be evil!

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...