I agree with Cotton, governments are trying,the print
money solution, which is the only one could work and
is responsible for the rush to buy land and gold.
Anything which people with cash think will hold its
value as cash is devalued by this quantative easing.
I dont think there is any agenda to Chinese land
buying just the desire to turn cash into an asset. I
myself would rather own land than have cash in the
bank today. In fact I think I would rather have
anything physical.
If we have the other option Cotton describes, which is
what will happen when the quanative easing loses
credibility.
I dont think cash will be king or not the cash we
have today.
I dont think democracy would survive. I think at some
stage quite soon in the true senario he describes law
and order would break down as the disposesed take
to the streets.
Would the police or army be able or even willing to
take back control if not I think we would see how
fragile our just in time civilisation is.
money solution, which is the only one could work and
is responsible for the rush to buy land and gold.
Anything which people with cash think will hold its
value as cash is devalued by this quantative easing.
I dont think there is any agenda to Chinese land
buying just the desire to turn cash into an asset. I
myself would rather own land than have cash in the
bank today. In fact I think I would rather have
anything physical.
If we have the other option Cotton describes, which is
what will happen when the quanative easing loses
credibility.
I dont think cash will be king or not the cash we
have today.
I dont think democracy would survive. I think at some
stage quite soon in the true senario he describes law
and order would break down as the disposesed take
to the streets.
Would the police or army be able or even willing to
take back control if not I think we would see how
fragile our just in time civilisation is.
Comment