Your description can be perceived in several different ways.
"4 of us
met last week and would have cleaned him out in
30 days with money not wait till fall."
One interpretation could be that four farmers collaborated to divide up someone else's property. There were not four bidders; there was a collusion to limit bidding.
That could be seen as offensive; and borderline; if not downright illegal; and possibly the reason anyone not connected would have been given first chance.
Just a posibility; as I've seen it happen before. Warmed my heart too.
"4 of us
met last week and would have cleaned him out in
30 days with money not wait till fall."
One interpretation could be that four farmers collaborated to divide up someone else's property. There were not four bidders; there was a collusion to limit bidding.
That could be seen as offensive; and borderline; if not downright illegal; and possibly the reason anyone not connected would have been given first chance.
Just a posibility; as I've seen it happen before. Warmed my heart too.
Comment