I see your point of view saskfarmer3. I don't sympathize.
You have only made it easier for the next stage. You were a relatively small player in this big game. Your part was accumulating a few quarters here and there. You now witness the next step of being gobbled yourself.
The only efficiency gained was eliminating the need for so much on farm labor. My guess is that the weight of iron increased by the "square"; and energy savings from fuel were offset by energy and transportation of refined chemicals and various gadgets now relied upon and seen as crucial parts of the farm economy.
This was also done at the expense of the fabric of rural farm life. I could give some examples; but just look at the local loss of your farm neighbours.
The replacements are and will be more correctly called acreages.
You have only made it easier for the next stage. You were a relatively small player in this big game. Your part was accumulating a few quarters here and there. You now witness the next step of being gobbled yourself.
The only efficiency gained was eliminating the need for so much on farm labor. My guess is that the weight of iron increased by the "square"; and energy savings from fuel were offset by energy and transportation of refined chemicals and various gadgets now relied upon and seen as crucial parts of the farm economy.
This was also done at the expense of the fabric of rural farm life. I could give some examples; but just look at the local loss of your farm neighbours.
The replacements are and will be more correctly called acreages.
Comment