• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Defeated Tory Gets a Plum appointment With Alberta Ag

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Defeated Tory Gets a Plum appointment With Alberta Ag

    Defeated Tory cabinet minister Berger gets plum civil service job
    By James Wood, Calgary Herald August 16, 2012 •Story•Photos ( 1 )
    Postmedia News/Files Evan Berger was offered a contract Thursday as policy adviser to deputy minister of agriculture John Knapp.Photograph by: Shaughn ButtsA defeated Tory cabinet minister is going back on the Alberta government payroll in an appointment the Wildrose Opposition says raises big concerns over Progressive Conservative cronyism and the politicization of the civil service.

    Evan Berger, who was agriculture minister before losing his Livingstone-Macleod riding in the spring provincial election, was offered a contract Thursday as senior policy adviser to deputy minister of agriculture John Knapp.

    Knapp said he was solely responsible for hiring Berger to the civil service post based out of Lethbridge — which pays in a range between $120,158 and $157,910, plus pension and benefits — and there was no involvement by any elected members of the Progressive Conservative government.

    There was no posting or open competition for the job because Berger had the “exact skill set” needed, he said.

    “Where it’s clear given the criteria you’re looking for — in other words the deep policy knowledge, the experience, the ability to integrate issues in a way that clearly Mr. Berger has demonstrated in the past — holding a competition wastes public dollars, wastes time and effort, and is highly inefficient,” said Knapp, who served as Berger’s top public service official when he was in cabinet.

    Berger — who was first elected in 2008 and was appointed to cabinet by Premier Alison Redford last October — said he doubted there would be much public concern over his appointment because of his qualifications. He said he will be dealing with many of the agricultural programs he helped initiate in government. Berger said he will retain his PC membership and likely remain politically active.

    “I would think I would probably still be around different things,” said Berger, who added he may run again for his old seat in the next election.

    “Four years is a long ways out. I’ve said to people if the support is there and people are looking, I’m willing.”

    Berger lost to Pat Stier in the Wildrose Party’s near sweep of rural southern Alberta.

    According to an estimate by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s Scott Hennig, Berger would have been eligible for around $147,000 under the transition allowance available for defeated and retiring MLAs.

    Berger said he has not touched the allowance, but it remains available to him in the future.

    Wildrose MLA Shayne Saskiw scoffed at the idea there was no political role in Berger’s hiring.

    “This completely demonstrates Premier Redford’s inability to change the PC party at all. It’s the same-old, same-old culture of entitlement. Here we have an individual that lost an election and because he’s a friend of the PCs he’s getting a lucrative contract in the six figures,” he said. “It seems like another PC at the taxpayer trough.”

    Tory Agriculture Minister Verlyn Olson was not made available to comment. His press secretary, Cathy Housdorff, said Olson did not have a role in the hiring, but had no problem with Berger’s appointment.

    The appointment needed the approval of the province’s ethics commissioner.

    Former ministers face a one-year period where they are forbidden to “solicit or accept a contract or benefit from a department of the public service or a provincial agency with which the former minister had significant official dealings” during their final year in cabinet, according to conflict of interest legislation.

    The ethics commissioner can, however, waive that cooling-off period, which Knapp said had been done.

    “I’m absolutely confident both the hire was appropriate and the process behind the hire was fair, transparent, above board and clearly had the green light from the ethics commissioner,” said Knapp.

    jwood@calgaryherald.com

    © Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald

    Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Defeated Tory cabinet minister Berger gets plum civil service/7102943/story.html#ixzz23niukLC5

    #2
    I would agree with KNAPP; Berger is a nice enough guy... I would not hold this against him... I would agree that he is qualified for the job.

    These decisions were made by the Alberta people when they elected Alison... now the expected result is occuring.

    Cheers... much more important things happening!

    Comment


      #3
      Okay...let's say we fire Knapp and keep Berger. If Berger is needed to advise Knapp then who needs Knapp?

      This whole situation really points out the ridiculous hold that the PC party has over Albertans if they think its okay to pull these kind of deals.

      Forty plus years of PC party control is ENOUGH. For gawd's sake oust them and put some fresh blood in to clean the garbage out of the system.

      Comment


        #4
        TOM: This is a newly created position.
        I would suggest a position created for one purpose.....to keep one of the old boys in the trough?
        Evan Berger was one of the biggest opponents to property rights....he was Ted Mortons lap dog.
        You might also find it interesting Berger has opened a "constituency office" in his old riding? How can a civil servant open a political constituency office?
        I find it interesting that the one year cooling off period was waived by the ethics commissioner? I also find it interesting that this was a "non competition" appointment....for a new "make work" job?
        Well so much for that transparency thing?
        Come on TOM.....even you must realize this is nothing more than pork barrel politics!

        Comment


          #5
          THIS IS JUST GREAT. The pork industry has
          recovered in Albertie and is alive and
          well. Tory politicos are like a rash,
          they keep coming back agin and agin, ta
          feed in the PUBLIC TROUGH. BERGIE was no
          good as gag minister, so lets hire him
          back as a gag advisor. Comedian
          angribusiness at its best, keep sloppin
          the hogs, ta keep this province is gonna
          go forward, corruption prevails.......

          Comment


            #6
            "Come on TOM.....even you must realize this is nothing more than pork barrel politics!"

            We elected who we did... now we must live with the outcome.

            xMinister Berger learned the hard way... what folks thought of his stand on property rights.

            Hopefully he has learned something...

            We have 4 years till the next election... a positive attitude will very likely be more constructive than calling people names... based on political retoric.

            I hope John Knapp is right... and we can have constructive comunication with the Ag Dept.

            Better to try... and hope for the best!

            Comment


              #7
              Tom, if you think this "deal" is okay then you are more gullible than I ever imagined. Not much different than the "magic beans" that Jack got for his cow in the old tale of "Jack and the Beanstalk".

              This whole situation STINKS and our Premier should void this appointment if she has any GUTS.

              Comment


                #8
                Tom you surprise me on this. I kind of thought you were a fight against what is wrong and for what is right kind of a guy. The folks in Livingstone Macleod spoke loud and clear and that is now be thrown back in their face by the Government. We have ethics rules for a reason and they even admit this contravenes said rules. I can think of all sorts of nice qualified guys for this job that are clear of breaking any rules. The $147,000 transition allowance was in place so there was no egregious affect caused to Mr. Berger by not being able to work in this capacity for the year timeout. Is he going to give that back to the taxpayer because he is clearly being looked after and it is redundant?

                Getting along and speaking out about things that are clearly wrong are two different things. The only way this will change is for us to speak out.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I'm a nice guy too! Wheres my frkn pork
                  barrel appointment. Ooops fergot, didn't
                  vote tory, soooos I get sh@tshoved in it
                  fer reward. I am really, really, really
                  hating politicos more and more as I
                  age....... Scum sucking ass kissing
                  trough sucking bottom feeders they are.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Burbert: Don't be shy......tell us how you really feel! LOL

                    Comment


                      #11
                      ASRG,

                      I was being practical.

                      If I were John Knapp... I would want someone the Premier and Ag Minister trusted. If Wildrose had formed the Gov. EXACTLY the same complaints would have come from PC supporters when people close to the Wildrose Political system had been appointed to these positions. This is simply the reality of Politics. Complaining will do nothing to change it. The Ethics Commissioner has ruled... it is within the rules; If I were governing... I would need people I knew and trusted to work with. This isn't a mountain to die on from my perspective.

                      Cheers!

                      Comment


                        #12
                        How did John Knapp get along all these years without a person in this position? Wasn't it necessary under Horner or Groeneveld or Hayden or Berger. Why does he need a policy advisor now? Why not a former minister that is past the statute of limitations?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I think Berger's appointment simply is for the fact that there is no government representation whatsoever in southern Alberta and this will help the current ag minister keep in touch with agriculture across the province. Not sure if this move is right or wrong but I think that is what is about

                          Comment


                            #14
                            We have MLS's who if the government had any respect for the system could be our conduit. The Dm's, ADM's, directors and specialist who work for the government haven't gone away. If that is the reason then it is a slap in the face to the electorate and also the government should be honest about it. I see Mr. Berger is a recipient of the Queens Jubilee metal, congrats.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Sorry MLA's, I wish we could edit on here.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...