Some good practical railway reforms suggested here to improve capacity, efficiencies, accountability and competitiveness/competition. IMO, this should be the end game. I believe this issue would have been political suicide to change in the past, and I applaud the current government for tackling this very complicated, multi-dimensional issue. Feds are going to take crap or praise for what's going on in this file, but to suggest govt is simply catering to "railway lobby at the expense of the economy", their shareholders, or their profits is short sited. There is no doubt in my mind that shaping agriculture for tomorrow is fully on the radar and we have to roll with it....good and bad.
Still don't get the old CWB supporters thinking. This political thing stripped/seized wealth...not all bad in broad terms, but bad in terms of western economic development. I hope the remnants of that system survives in some form and transforms into a "true" competitor.
Logistics issues aside, I think 2 things are needed. Railway competitiveness...Bucket has a pretty good handle on it....and a system built/designed for the future that encourages and attracts diverse and value-add agriculture investment that simply does NOT focus of exporting raw material, jobs, and wealth generation. If the shit show was a means to this end, then good on govt, the railways, and the grainco's for paying their part.
I say this having been negatively affected as much as the next guy. I dont' think I'm niave enough to think "positioning" for future markets/economic environment isn't happening, but I think I see for the most part what govt is trying to do. I for one like where we are heading....or being led.
Still don't get the old CWB supporters thinking. This political thing stripped/seized wealth...not all bad in broad terms, but bad in terms of western economic development. I hope the remnants of that system survives in some form and transforms into a "true" competitor.
Logistics issues aside, I think 2 things are needed. Railway competitiveness...Bucket has a pretty good handle on it....and a system built/designed for the future that encourages and attracts diverse and value-add agriculture investment that simply does NOT focus of exporting raw material, jobs, and wealth generation. If the shit show was a means to this end, then good on govt, the railways, and the grainco's for paying their part.
I say this having been negatively affected as much as the next guy. I dont' think I'm niave enough to think "positioning" for future markets/economic environment isn't happening, but I think I see for the most part what govt is trying to do. I for one like where we are heading....or being led.
Comment