future of the CWB

[mustardman]

The cons stated from the start that it would be sold in 5 years so that takes us to 2017.
With the Huge profits "made only in Canada" in grain handling I think an ADM or Louis Drefus, or Bunge to Get more involved in the game here.

And the Cons will continue to tell us how THEY are the only party to support Agriculture When in fact their Record shows Just the opposite. We have Never had an Ag minister do more damage to Western Ag than this homegrown talking mustache.

[TASFarms]

Cwb in theory should have been good for farmers. But it became corrupt just like 90% of the elevating companies

[CptnObvious]

Well said mustardman. I was sure Cargil would wind up with the whole pie.
TAS: Corrupt? No board member got rich, there was no retained earnings, and most of the 75% of staff fired by Ritz can make better money in the private sector. Who profited from misdealing?

[bucket]

From my point of view judging by how quickly Ritz responds publicly in the western producer to his shortcomings he might be recognizing there is a problem but is still too stupid to realize he caused it. Well along with some bad advice . But he was too stupid to talk the average farmer that had a more balanced view.

I always discount opinions of the extremes.

[Hopalong]

Too many of us thought we could have our cake and eat it.
A farmer owned, government supported entity to compete with established players.
Does not much happen with other trade dependent countries, why do we expect it to be different with Canada?

[bucket]

True but other countries don't leave agriculture hang out to dry like in Canada.

The government in the states provides the mechanism of government involvement thru it's farm programs.

Right or wrong don't know but provides balance within their ag sector.

Not so in Canada. Farmers are left competing against the US programs.