Partners in Innovation Support PBR Amendments at Committee

[CptnObvious]

Check the bios of the successful SWDC candidates. They were all elected with a strong mandate to support public plant breeding. It appears that most farmers agree with bucket on the self-serving nature of large corporations, and the SWDC has an obligation to follow the policies that we voted for.
There is an old Chinese saying, 'To take no action is an action.' The SWDC not joining the 'Partners in Innovation' says that these partners may not hold the interests of farmers paramount as the 'farmer first' SWDC does. Seeing as their absence was noticed this appears to have been successful.

[bucket]

I am not saying it was right or wrong.

But anyone that claims to have farmers interests as their mandate better ****ing well be at the table on my behalf.

I didn't want protesters as a farm voice I want them at the table to voice their concerns.

This only continues the divide and conquer technique.

The partners in innovation seems one sided to the right with the same players involved.

Just an observation. Not debatable.

[sumdumguy]

Chuckchuck, I like the Pulse model too, but lobbying government is the name of the game so farmers be damned.