dum.....because the company is Scoular (not Scoulr)... as if I don't make spelling errors.
Seriously; read that court document. Scoular isn't a fly by night business. They claim; and it is no doubt true; that without their expertise in grain trading; their long term proprietary relationship with companies such as BNSF and even Homeland Security; that this project wouldn't have been even feasible or have gotten government approvals that have been obtained. As I read it; they claim that Scoular was used and that their company is owed "millions" of dollars.
They note that this would have been the 6th north -south rail connection in Western Canada. That doesn't conflict with a statement that this would be the third north-south rail connection between the Rocky Mountains and the Lakehead.
Farmers need every bit of rail line access that they can get. And BNSF has committed to supplying significant car number.
And for those interested in oil movement.... such as cotton....read that single line that pretty much claims that there are no takers on the "partnerships" for moving oil from this "Port".
Additionally; it is such interest that a new rail "Port" generates; that drives additional expansion plans of competitors. My guess is that reputable companies such as Scoular are still very much in the running to establish a grain company presence in Canada; and that entities such as the Northgate ND (General Mills-Viterra plant) are weighing their options. And the very lightly used Richardson facility at Northgate SK on the CNR line has potential and so on and so on.
If nothing else; providing new facilities for someone else takes some of the pressure off the infrasrtructure and facilities that others must use.
What isn't productive is to support and even put all your eggs in baskets that are unservicable and grossly flawed in concept and implementation.
Ending up in near financial ruin and court battles doesn't show an ideal plan. Some results are predictable....if you sqirrel out the facts from the cloak of secrecy.
Seriously; read that court document. Scoular isn't a fly by night business. They claim; and it is no doubt true; that without their expertise in grain trading; their long term proprietary relationship with companies such as BNSF and even Homeland Security; that this project wouldn't have been even feasible or have gotten government approvals that have been obtained. As I read it; they claim that Scoular was used and that their company is owed "millions" of dollars.
They note that this would have been the 6th north -south rail connection in Western Canada. That doesn't conflict with a statement that this would be the third north-south rail connection between the Rocky Mountains and the Lakehead.
Farmers need every bit of rail line access that they can get. And BNSF has committed to supplying significant car number.
And for those interested in oil movement.... such as cotton....read that single line that pretty much claims that there are no takers on the "partnerships" for moving oil from this "Port".
Additionally; it is such interest that a new rail "Port" generates; that drives additional expansion plans of competitors. My guess is that reputable companies such as Scoular are still very much in the running to establish a grain company presence in Canada; and that entities such as the Northgate ND (General Mills-Viterra plant) are weighing their options. And the very lightly used Richardson facility at Northgate SK on the CNR line has potential and so on and so on.
If nothing else; providing new facilities for someone else takes some of the pressure off the infrasrtructure and facilities that others must use.
What isn't productive is to support and even put all your eggs in baskets that are unservicable and grossly flawed in concept and implementation.
Ending up in near financial ruin and court battles doesn't show an ideal plan. Some results are predictable....if you sqirrel out the facts from the cloak of secrecy.
Comment