Anyone who get Grain News should pay particularly close attention to the articles on page 8.
The article on how the PRO is calculated is essentially accurate but not enough. Comments?
I admit to having to be amazed by the malt barley article.
Without going into the malt issue, it amazes me that the CWB would brag about not even being able to achieve a feed barley price in their PRO - some one from Saskatchewan will have to comment but my guess is that you had a strong look at $3/bu or $138/t for most of this past crop year and the money is all sitting in the bank. It would seen to suggest that 6 row malt barley was not even on the radar scene and most farmers were good marketers enough to sell to the highest priced market - the feed one.
I also find it entertaining when the CWB goes back to the 1993 continental barley market days to make their points. Just a note - I was working at the CWB in the sales department at this time. As usual, they are very selective in the information they relate. If they are going to bring up information, they should make sure everything is on the table about the time period. They had also better be prepared to have some of the same accountability for their own sales - eg. the year they shorted the California feed barley market).
A final point is that they should have at least referenced their US malt barley numbers - did they come out of the air or from a legitimate source?
The article on how the PRO is calculated is essentially accurate but not enough. Comments?
I admit to having to be amazed by the malt barley article.
Without going into the malt issue, it amazes me that the CWB would brag about not even being able to achieve a feed barley price in their PRO - some one from Saskatchewan will have to comment but my guess is that you had a strong look at $3/bu or $138/t for most of this past crop year and the money is all sitting in the bank. It would seen to suggest that 6 row malt barley was not even on the radar scene and most farmers were good marketers enough to sell to the highest priced market - the feed one.
I also find it entertaining when the CWB goes back to the 1993 continental barley market days to make their points. Just a note - I was working at the CWB in the sales department at this time. As usual, they are very selective in the information they relate. If they are going to bring up information, they should make sure everything is on the table about the time period. They had also better be prepared to have some of the same accountability for their own sales - eg. the year they shorted the California feed barley market).
A final point is that they should have at least referenced their US malt barley numbers - did they come out of the air or from a legitimate source?
Comment