• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

While the puppets play

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    While the puppets play

    The real work continues promoting farmers interests:


    For Immediate Release December 19, 2014

    Federal government must ensure fusarium research genetics remain in the public domain, says NFU


    The federal government has issued a call for proposals to transfer and possibly sell off Agriculture Canada cereal crop research and plant breeding germplasm related to the devastating plant disease fusarium.

    "The National Farmers Union is deeply distressed by the short-sighted actions of the federal government in cutting support to world renowned programs such as the resistance research program in Quebec and its letting go of equally renowned scientists, including André Comeau who was leading this fusarium-resistance work,” said Jan Slomp, NFU President.

    "Fusarium is a devastating plant disease that, once it infects a crop, can result in toxicity so severe the harvested crop is no longer suitable for human or animal consumption. It is becoming an increasingly prevalent problem throughout the country,” said Matt Gehl, NFU Region 6 (Saskatchewan) board member.

    "The work done by public researchers in Quebec working for Agriculture Canada was extremely important to farmers and the Canadian public. Indeed, the resulting material must remain in the public domain, as it was paid for largely by the public, and the research was intended to benefit all of us,” said Terry Boehm, Chair of the NFU Seed and Trade Committee. "Any future fusarium-resistant seed varieties that result from this germplasm should be made available to farmers at minimal cost because widespread use of the seed will deliver huge benefits to the whole Canadian economy.”

    "We must remember that Ag Canada seed research and materials such as the germplasm it plans to transfer are built upon thousands of years of plant selection and breeding conducted by farmers. In the last century most of the world’s additional plant-breeding research has been done by publicly financed scientists. Therefore the resulting seed varieties should be made available to benefit us all. They should not end up in the hands of a few giant seed companies to be sold to farmers at exorbitant prices, or worse, withheld so that chemical solutions can be sold instead,” emphasized Boehm.

    "We hope that the germplasm of these Ag Canada cereal lines ends up at a public institution that will be able to do the long-term research to develop useful varieties, and that the results will be offered to farmers without becoming tied up in a morass of intellectual property rights issues that has become so common,” added Gehl.

    “The federal government has a responsibility to the public that goes beyond simple cost cutting. It should understand that the economy benefits immensely from public research done in the public interest. If the government does not understand this, they jeopardize our long term future,” concluded Slomp.

    - 30 -

    For more information:

    Jan Slomp, NFU President: (403) 843-2068 or (403) 704-4364
    Terry Boehm, Chair, NFU Seed and Trade Committee: (306) 255-2880 cell: (306) 255-7638
    Matt Gehl, NFU Region 6 (Saskatchewan) Board Member: (306) 216-6064

    #2
    thousands of years?

    Its far more likely private companies will come up with fusarium resistance. And they will own it. And they will sell it for whatever the market will pay for it. That, and many other traits.

    Comment


      #3
      Yes, thousands of years. Wheat for example was first domesticated in the mid-East around 7500BC. Farmer selection from the outset.
      The whole point is that private companies WON'T come up with fusarium resistance by their own ingenuity and resources they would likely develop it by taking over the public funded work that has been done to date. Farmer produced seeds with public funded research and development for the common good.
      Why would anyone be eager to break that system and give the existing research based on farmer developed seeds to private corporations who would then "patent" this as if it was something that belonged to them and then sell it back to farmers in a rigged market place where there is no alternate supply?

      I'm sure Ritz will think its a Cracker of an idea.

      Comment


        #4
        I agree, why would anyone turn the existing research over to the private sector? It is a poor idea.

        However, just because AAFC develops a resistant strain doesn't follow that the variety would be public domain. There would still be patent protection and resulting levies. Otherwise, what would keep talented plant breeders rewarded?

        Comment


          #5
          You mean like clubroot resistance created by Ag Canada? That kind of 'common good' ?

          Oh wait, private did it.

          Syngenta will become leaders in new tech in wheat. But of course you can keep growing Roblin if you wish. Just don't expect midge resistant, fus resistant, rust resistant... wheat to be free.

          I don't care if its public or private, you need MONEY to get great germplasm and farmers, if they want it, are going to have to pay for it.

          Name me two great things Ag Canada has done in the last 5 years. Ok, maybe even just one.

          Comment


            #6
            Well Syngenta has a ways to go - there HRSW sucked as well as there canola all over here ..

            Comment


              #7
              tweety
              the odds of whether public or private
              research would cure it first,
              are pretty debate able, because at least on the drug front, 70 % of new drugs come from public research.

              the only difference , is with public research the cost is one time .

              with private and the gift of endless
              property rights and patents granted by our govt. you will pay forever.

              once this govt. abandons research
              to the benefit of it's corporate buddies.
              all benefits of anything new will be
              simply turn into a yearly cost paid
              by consumer or producer.

              and with the abandonment of public
              research.(just like drugs) private firms will only work on big things , they can make gobs of money on.
              so if you have a smaller problem
              to fix. well the taxpayer can pay for that.

              Comment


                #8
                Point is it takes money, lots of it. And right now the system is broke with the results accordingly.

                I personally don't care who does it, as long as someone does. And if it makes financial sense, i will buy it, and from that more will be innovated.

                Just like canola, the most expensive newest seed is always bought up by the biggest whiners of seed cost and critics of the private model.

                Comment


                  #9
                  But how can the system be broken? don't all you "free enterprise" believers believe what you preach? If there is a problem awaiting a solution one of your free enterprise corporations could come in and design a solution and charge what the market will pay for it - isn't that how it works? Nothing to stop a company breeding a fusarium resistant variety from scratch and being first on the market with it.

                  Truth is they are waiting for Government assistance either by handicapping the existing competition or by direct financial donation. That's the truth of your flawed "free market" as it operates in Canada. Pity some of you are so blinded by the ideology that you can't see whats in front of you.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Grass farmer. What is wrong with private companies paying to government money for the germ plasm. This doesn't stop the govt from continuing on with their research and you can buy the seed from them when they come up with something. You can then use that seed over and over to your hearts content.
                    If the private company in the mean time comes up with their own traits I can buy that seed from them or the governments seed. It's my choice and has no consequences to you. Not sure what the problem is.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      grass...trouble is there are people blinded by the ideology that governments are the only ones who can/should/should be trusted to manage things. The financial demands of the complacent/entitled/privileged in this space and others as it exists in Canada are huge and has largely gone unchecked in terms of efficient use of public dollars. This is an inconvenient truth. I view competition with strong Canadian government oversight/regulation in the seed space as a healthy thing. Some don't see it this way.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        And the list of Ag Canada achievements is what?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Pretty much every new cereal variety produced in the last 80 years. Oh and you WERN'T charged $12 a POUND like our famous private canola companies are doing

                          Comment


                            #14
                            mbdog,

                            "I view competition with strong Canadian government oversight/regulation…... as a healthy thing."

                            So do I - unfortunately what we get, particularly with the current Government, is no competition and no proper oversight/regulation.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Fortunately, because of the current government, we are having this debate. The long/short outcome is unknown. Net/net in terms of public policy and the producer is concerned, enabling competition, growth, opportunity and accountability, and not entitlement should drive the outcome.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...