About 8 or 9 years ago, there was a company called FarmCorp. They were into block marketing grain. Kind of a consolidation company so big and small farmers could collectively sell a large volume block of grain. Similar to the CWB in many ways, but possibly more agile.
I had just left the conventional farming, so I did not learn the nuts and bolts of it very well.
I think mow they are called Virtex, they bought a non GMO canola crush plant in Saskatoon.
My neighbour farms 4500 acres and he sold all his grains through them for a couple of years. He was satisfied and described several advantages. Like booking semis, and some financial gains which are anecdotal, but he is fairly honest and I believed it.
Naturally, my neighbours only negative perception was that farmers can't work together, so the big farming neighbours did not sell to farmcorp because they were already negotiating their own large volume sales of grain, input purchases and they are doing just fine, thank you very much.
Because it has already been done by farmcorp, and they are still active, I think it would not take much effort to go back to this marketing concept. They have already learned from past experience, the rest is mostly farmers willing to grade their own inventory and volunteer their grain to be sold through the farm crop/virtex grain entity.
I think FNA also was selling peas and lentils in this manner around the same timeline. Same thing, I not sure of the nuts and bolts from that entity at the time.
Just some thoughts, most grain councils, and associations seem to be more favourable to the input and purchase companies as described above. I have not heard anything from APASS in a long time. The last I remember there was infighting amongst themselves and the leaders so I got disgusted with them and tuned out. That was a long time ago and I am out of touch with reality. It seems like APASS is funded by a little pinch from our property taxes.
So, if farmers are actually willing, and don't just say they are willing on An Internet forum, the Farmcorp entity is still around and they were functional, I don't think we have to re invent the wheel. Farmers now know what needs modifying,
I had just left the conventional farming, so I did not learn the nuts and bolts of it very well.
I think mow they are called Virtex, they bought a non GMO canola crush plant in Saskatoon.
My neighbour farms 4500 acres and he sold all his grains through them for a couple of years. He was satisfied and described several advantages. Like booking semis, and some financial gains which are anecdotal, but he is fairly honest and I believed it.
Naturally, my neighbours only negative perception was that farmers can't work together, so the big farming neighbours did not sell to farmcorp because they were already negotiating their own large volume sales of grain, input purchases and they are doing just fine, thank you very much.
Because it has already been done by farmcorp, and they are still active, I think it would not take much effort to go back to this marketing concept. They have already learned from past experience, the rest is mostly farmers willing to grade their own inventory and volunteer their grain to be sold through the farm crop/virtex grain entity.
I think FNA also was selling peas and lentils in this manner around the same timeline. Same thing, I not sure of the nuts and bolts from that entity at the time.
Just some thoughts, most grain councils, and associations seem to be more favourable to the input and purchase companies as described above. I have not heard anything from APASS in a long time. The last I remember there was infighting amongst themselves and the leaders so I got disgusted with them and tuned out. That was a long time ago and I am out of touch with reality. It seems like APASS is funded by a little pinch from our property taxes.
So, if farmers are actually willing, and don't just say they are willing on An Internet forum, the Farmcorp entity is still around and they were functional, I don't think we have to re invent the wheel. Farmers now know what needs modifying,
Comment