SF3 et el;
It was illegal before to brownbag and sell seed that were PBR protected.
Under UPOV 91 that remains the same... but now your 'right to encourage the law being broken'... is somewhat diminished because the buyer can now be brought into the investigation of the illegal act.
How is this wrong? Why do you feel justified in defending illegal actions?
How is it any different... that a railway... not hauling freight from out of the way positions... or to destinations other that the normal and most convenient drop off point... to increase profit?
Where is the moral obligation... to respect the property of those people... who it is close to impossible to defend themselves against aggressive overreach and collusive treatment of those who are having their property taken unfairly? (Farmers vs plant breeders)
And how is this any different... than not charging costs (normal meaning) of a service to be provided under the law... but many times as much as that accountable cost was which caused the gov to change the an act of the parliament...on certain expenses being charged above real cost in 2007-08?
This lowered our cost by $2.20/t and decreased our basis charge by that much.
So domestic buyers now were forced to pay a higher price... even though it did not use the services directly of the monopoly. Double benefit to farmers.
The problem with the CWB monopoly and buyback was directly responsible for stopping reasonable arbitrage... handing the transport service directly to another monopoly... and farmers could do exactly NOTHING to prevent the taking of their property in an immoral system that taxed farmers... who were claimed to have had a benefit instead by the gov... (Goodale) and the other monopolies who were the direct beneficiaries (Grain buyers and transporters)
The under delivery of producer transport systems... is an obvious collusion... to drive grain to the normal export systems... at the direct cost of farmers in a lower end price at the farm gate...
I hope I do not get confiscated more for bringing this up here.
It was illegal before to brownbag and sell seed that were PBR protected.
Under UPOV 91 that remains the same... but now your 'right to encourage the law being broken'... is somewhat diminished because the buyer can now be brought into the investigation of the illegal act.
How is this wrong? Why do you feel justified in defending illegal actions?
How is it any different... that a railway... not hauling freight from out of the way positions... or to destinations other that the normal and most convenient drop off point... to increase profit?
Where is the moral obligation... to respect the property of those people... who it is close to impossible to defend themselves against aggressive overreach and collusive treatment of those who are having their property taken unfairly? (Farmers vs plant breeders)
And how is this any different... than not charging costs (normal meaning) of a service to be provided under the law... but many times as much as that accountable cost was which caused the gov to change the an act of the parliament...on certain expenses being charged above real cost in 2007-08?
This lowered our cost by $2.20/t and decreased our basis charge by that much.
So domestic buyers now were forced to pay a higher price... even though it did not use the services directly of the monopoly. Double benefit to farmers.
The problem with the CWB monopoly and buyback was directly responsible for stopping reasonable arbitrage... handing the transport service directly to another monopoly... and farmers could do exactly NOTHING to prevent the taking of their property in an immoral system that taxed farmers... who were claimed to have had a benefit instead by the gov... (Goodale) and the other monopolies who were the direct beneficiaries (Grain buyers and transporters)
The under delivery of producer transport systems... is an obvious collusion... to drive grain to the normal export systems... at the direct cost of farmers in a lower end price at the farm gate...
I hope I do not get confiscated more for bringing this up here.
Comment