• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The performance update for Grain Week 27

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    The performance update for Grain Week 27

    Summary
    The performance update for Grain Week 27 has restated net unfulfilled shipper demand on the basis of previously unreported rejected cars and railway cancellations related to hopper car ordering rules imposed by the railways at the beginning of the current grain year. While total unfulfilled shipper demand remains in excess of 22,000 cars for the current year the net unfulfilled demand – those orders that shippers continue to expect the railways to supply excluding orders associated with rejected cars, denied orders and railway cancellations – is now 11,209 orders.
    Railway Car Supply – Grain Week 27
     CN spotted 3,581 hopper cars and CP spotted 2,985 hopper cars in the country in Grain Week 27 for a total supply of 6,566 cars – this included 3,408 cars that had been ordered for prior weeks. Grain Week 27 car spotting performance for CN was equivalent to its weekly average of 3,600 cars per week while CP spotting performance was below its YTD average performance of approximately 3,600 cars per week.
    o In Grain Week 27 CN and CP supplied 2,798 (32%) of the 8,693 hopper cars ordered for delivery in Grain Week 27 representing a shortfall of 5,895 cars for Grain Week 27 orders.
    o In the crop year to date, railways have supplied 43% of customer orders in the week for which cars were ordered with CN providing 56% of cars for the week they were ordered and CP 30% of cars in the week they were ordered.
    ï‚· Through the first 27 weeks of the current crop year, railways have failed to supply 22,488 hopper cars ordered by shippers. This represents a shortfall equivalent to 11% of shipper demand. The number of hopper car orders not filled by both CN and CP has continued to increase each week since the beginning of the crop year; overall, unfulfilled orders have levelled off at about 10% of total shipper demand in recent weeks indicating that the railways are not making up ground for prior week shortfalls.
    o more than 2,500 customer orders – approximately 22% of unfulfilled orders - have been outstanding for 4 weeks or longer [1]
    ï‚· Boxcar shippers received 65% of cars ordered for Grain Week 27. This represents a drop in performance following 4 consecutive weeks of strong performance for this shipper group. Year to date fulfillment remains at 65% of shipper orders.
    Corridor Performance
    ï‚· In Grain Week 27, uncharacteristic with performance experienced thus far this year, traffic destined to bulk terminals in Western Canada received a lower percentage (31%) of cars than other corridors. By comparison, non-bulk corridors including the USA/Mexico, Vancouver transload and Canadian domestic corridors received 40% of cars ordered for delivery in Grain Week 27.
    ï‚· While CN fulfilled 65% of orders in non-bulk corridors, CP supplied 23% of cars for current week orders in Grain Week 27 in non-bulk corridors.
    Railway Dwell Times at Country Origins:
     In Grain Week 27, CN’s loaded dwell times for multicar block traffic at country origin locations averaged 46 hours while CP’s loaded dwell times averaged 57 hours. CN’s performance in Grain Week 27 is worse than its


    [1] Based on net unfulfilled demand – excluding rejections, cancellations and denied orders – of 11,209.

    Page 2

    YTD average of 41 hours; CP performance improved in Grain Week 27 from the prior week and was slightly lower than its YTD average dwell time of 60 hours.
    o In the crop year to date, 34% of all bulk grain shipments have waited for more than 48 hours at origin for pick up by the railways after being released by shippers for movement to destination. 29% of shipments were picked up within 24 hours.
    Railway Dwell Times at Destination Terminals – Grain Week 24:
    ï‚· CN: Thunder Bay (63 hours), Vancouver bulk (16 hours) and Vancouver transload/local (91ours)
    ï‚· CP : Thunder Bay (77 hours), Vancouver bulk (23 hours) and Vancouver transload/local (103 hours)
    ï‚· Thunder Bay dwell times are based on limited traffic volumes as shipments to this terminal have slowed in recent weeks.

    #2
    Hey Tom when you call ritz does he tell you they see different numbers?

    If the system was working elevators would be close to empty.

    That's what we were promised with ng ranch line abandonment and concrete every 50 miles.

    The system is dysfunctional.

    Comment


      #3
      Bucket,

      I seldom talk With Minister Ritz...

      150 miles away...

      Just special events.

      Comment


        #4
        Tom

        I thought you said you had a meeting with him prior to that OIC being issued.

        I would think he and you would keep in touch. Along with your local MP.

        Can't see getting that court cost bill and you not having a talk with your MP.

        If nothing else just maybe to tell them how much that cost and the subsequent incompetence of the railways have cost all farmers.

        I know the conservatives seem to ignore criticism but none of this is acceptable.

        Comment


          #5
          Tom4CWB

          Do you remember the CWB when they took on both railways and won the battle.

          Tom, you got to admit this is ironic, the very organization that you so wanted to get rid of could be the one taking on the railways. The poor rail service would be front and center with press releases being put out daily by the CWB. The general public would be made fully aware of what farmers are facing with lack of rail service.

          Not here you are planning a hunger strike, and pleading fellow Agrivllers to send in letter to their MPs.

          Tom you thought you knew the answer to everything, and that what was best for all western grain farmers.

          Comment


            #6
            It is interesting turn of events forage but does this mean the cwb facilities are moving more grain than anyone else?

            If not what would stop them from making public statements?

            Might gain farmer support either way. Might be an easy PR campaign.

            Couldn't hurt?

            Comment


              #7
              The CWB is now run by Ritz and his hand picked Board of Directors. So I, can't see them coming out and saying anything against the RRs performance as the would really put Ritz in tough position.

              But, I fully agree with your statement if the CWB could put out statements on behalf of farmers. But I doubt it can happen being the CWB is under Ritz's control.

              Comment


                #8
                True but thought I would ask. It really couldn't hurt if they are looking for business.

                If the railways counter by hurting the new cwb with poor service - wouldn't ritz have to act?

                Comment


                  #9
                  The new CWB and the line cos wouldnt dare criticize the rrs publicly, that would cost them future rr service. They make an attempt thru the wgea, but doesnt have the same impact that hartley richardson, andrew paterson, or bill parrish would have. So dont expect them to speak up anytime soon.

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...