• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

#FREETHERAILS

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    It'll be easier to mandate the rail co to run 100% biodiesel then take their rail. Which would likely ensure they keep the crushers serviced........

    Comment


      #22
      Technically cn and cp received grants to build the Rail lines... along with property from the Federal government. This was in exchange for specifically moving western canadian farmers' grain.
      "quote"

      Certainly that's true. That was also the arguement used by supporters of the Crow rate, i.e. in exchange for all the land grants (CP) received to build the lines the rail companies would haul our grain "in perpetuity" for about 25 cents per bushel. Those land grants and the benefits the rail companies received were conveniently forgotten when Paul Martin stood up in the House of Commons and during his austerity budget, shot the Crow down for good.

      Sad fact is, the only agriculture sector government is willing to and has been able to take away benefits from over the years is the producers themselves. Grain companies and railways won't be touched, neither will seed and fertilizer companies. They have the money to get what they want, farmers have less than 5% of the votes at election time.

      Again, not slagging your idea but I've been to this circus too many times to believe change is possible.

      Comment


        #23
        I want to make one more point. Everyone on this forum thinks railways were built to move farmer's grain. I would argue they were built to move people out west and to supply those settlers with eastern goods. Grain was simply a great back haul at the times the rails were laid. And yes, as farming took hold, agreements were instituted like the Crow Rate to ensure grain would be moved. But farmers and governments have sold, or allowed many such agreements to lapse.

        Furthermore, you talk of the public grants to build the railways. The railways were paid in money and land to lay the track. There never was an agreement that this track would be public in fact, in CPs case they were actually given public financed and built track as part of the agreement to build the mainline. CP track has never been a public utility. We only have legislated level of service expectations. I wonder what a court would say is the level of service a railroad has to supply is given these service levels were mostly written before fertilizer, pesticides, and zero tillage. Rail never knew they would have to carry as much grain as they do; or oil, or containers.... and those shippers surely have the same expectation of service as farmers do.

        Comment


          #24
          What's in it for the Fed?
          - massive productivity, efficiency, and competitiveness improvements for a exporting nation.
          - fed govt would benefit from massive taxation revenue generated
          - ecconomic stimulus that printing cannot do on its own. JOBS, JOBS....
          - win a election, first massive economic stimulus in decades
          - not a subsidy, it generates revenue streams

          Comment


            #25
            I like the idea,nationalizing the tracks is a far cry than nationalizing existing companies,logistics may be a nightmare.

            Comment


              #26
              rare-earth, if you are talking of a new railroad, I could not argue with anything you are saying. But it will cost billions and we know this government has such a narrow minded focus of a balanced budget and free enterprise it is unable to even consider the economic benefit of a new public track open to all shippers and rail companies!

              Comment


                #27
                Rare earth

                Isn't that what statscan is for?

                To determine the level of growth and relate that info so companies like cp can build to the expected growth?

                And yes railways can be forced to move product. It happened last spring when the STB got the railways to move fertilizer in the states. Notice the shortage concerns disappeared last spring when that happened.

                Comment


                  #28
                  On the right track Klaus.
                  Open running rights. Run the system like an airport with a Control tower. Many companies paying to use the system and in fast ruckus. Objective to land the right product at the right time with arriving ships as efficient as possible. Like Tom said. Don't push trains to port. Pull them their with ships.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Fast ruckus? Lol. Wtf...... timely manner

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Lots of commie talk on here.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...