I am not suggesting the consumer should not have the right to choose what goes in their mouth. I often wonder the benefit of regulatory based mandatory labeling and market based.
Would there be a benefit to have a monster label that indicates food is produced from crops that are grown using conventional agricultural production methods as a regulatory requirement or the current where you label organic production/market it as a benefit in branded sense?
Perhaps the biggest challenge is to actually get consumers to read nutritional labels and use this information in their eating decisions.
Would there be a benefit to have a monster label that indicates food is produced from crops that are grown using conventional agricultural production methods as a regulatory requirement or the current where you label organic production/market it as a benefit in branded sense?
Perhaps the biggest challenge is to actually get consumers to read nutritional labels and use this information in their eating decisions.
Comment