• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hunger Strike Day 69 Jackson v CNCP... Treat!!!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Tweety,

    The Writ was put on my families farm by CN Rail and CP Rail... NOT any court. CNCP had a choice... CNCP did this long before appeals were exhausted against this action.

    Are you a lawyer Working for CNCP?

    Comment


      #22
      Are you named in the suit?

      Comment


        #23
        I am assuming only, but I suspect that the courts would enforce the writ, no matter who puts it on. Like a lien. Correct me if I am wrong.

        Comment


          #24
          SDG
          Courts don't put Writs on; AB Land titles allows whoever wants to (in this case CNCP legal Council) to put them on. Then if there is a problem the fight starts to get them taken off.
          Sorry the truth is more than you can accept Tweety.
          Cheers

          Comment


            #25
            WTF kind of answer is that?

            Riddles and bullshit.

            Comment


              #26
              No tweety
              Cheers!

              Comment


                #27
                Tom4cwb

                "AB Land titles allows whoever wants to (in this case CNCP legal Council) to put them on."


                There is money owed by you to CNCP for the court costs they incurred when you put your name on the original challenge and lost.

                For that reason land titles had no choice. Is this not the reason for the hunger strike?

                Tom

                Comment


                  #28
                  Can we put this to rest? Tom sort of explained his predicament. Outside of himself, no one else was involved - a strange way to launch a class action. Secondly, the judge ruled he was "frivolous and vexatious" in his suit, meaning he didn't have grounds to succeed because the authorizing agent, while aware of the rr's crime, did not invoke penalties. Thirdly, he has a writ placed on his farm while at the same time stating legal council is paying off the demands. And finally, we now know the "hunger strike" is nothing more than a fad diet! I'm finding it very hard to be sympathetic especially when Tom can't even garner media attention. So let's close the book, shall we?

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Your summary is my conclusion also rockpile. I just wanted Tom to coherently say it.

                    Never going to happen. Case closed.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      No wonder farmers have no say anywhere.
                      The real facts mean nothing. You make up what ever pleases your fancy. Then you are pleased with yourselves
                      Sorry for bothering you.
                      Tom

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...