After watching this past months weather and walking some customer's fields yesterday it got me thinking , would farmers be better off if possible to pay for more accurate long term (3week) forecasting than the obscenely high amount for high tech variable rate and all the iron and tech wizards to go with it ?? Let's take a 10,000 ac farm for shits and giggles and ease of figuring . 10,000 ac at $10/ac for the full meal deal just for the experts to come soil test every square foot or whatever, the satalite imagery, the software , and the field mapping wizardry . So for a cool $100,000 you good to go and get everything done perfect on every ac - then Mother Nature coughs up a hair ball .... Or spend a fraction on accurate weather forecasting keep things simple and efficient at seeding and be able to avoid potential weather problems with better seeding timing ? Ah , maybe just a pipe dream .
I would rather variable rate foliar feeding after the crop makes it if it requires more .
Just thinkin out loud here cause I know if some guys knew there was going to be 10 days of frosts with a few hard frosts , canola would have not been going in the ground before the 10 th of May at $300 plus per ac . Also on the flip side some guy would not have waited till after the 21 st to start canola because of dry conditions that are prevailing .
I would rather variable rate foliar feeding after the crop makes it if it requires more .
Just thinkin out loud here cause I know if some guys knew there was going to be 10 days of frosts with a few hard frosts , canola would have not been going in the ground before the 10 th of May at $300 plus per ac . Also on the flip side some guy would not have waited till after the 21 st to start canola because of dry conditions that are prevailing .
Comment