Thanks charliep, you are right on top pf things! These are the first two paragraphs:
Winnipeg -- The latest U.S. trade challenge against imports of Canadian spring wheat and durum will cost western Canadian farmers $8 million to $10 million to defend, according to CWB estimates.
"It is outrageous that such a case has been launched, based on scant evidence and influenced by politics," said Larry Hill, a Saskatchewan farmer and elected CWB director. "It will cost Canadian farmers dearly during a very difficult time. Farmers are very frustrated."
So here's the question.....who is LEGALLY responsible to pay for the trade challenges, according to what the ACT
states? Who was LEGALLY responsible for paying for past challenges?
thalpenny, Larry Hill or vader should address this. Or one of the other Directors. Surely they can answer at least one of my questions.
Parsley
Winnipeg -- The latest U.S. trade challenge against imports of Canadian spring wheat and durum will cost western Canadian farmers $8 million to $10 million to defend, according to CWB estimates.
"It is outrageous that such a case has been launched, based on scant evidence and influenced by politics," said Larry Hill, a Saskatchewan farmer and elected CWB director. "It will cost Canadian farmers dearly during a very difficult time. Farmers are very frustrated."
So here's the question.....who is LEGALLY responsible to pay for the trade challenges, according to what the ACT
states? Who was LEGALLY responsible for paying for past challenges?
thalpenny, Larry Hill or vader should address this. Or one of the other Directors. Surely they can answer at least one of my questions.
Parsley
Comment