• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cash and Pooled CWB prices

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    The Japanese pay Canada a premium over and above Portland prices. The premium is not a CWB benefit of single desk selling but rather the value the extra quality characturistics western Canada provides them.

    Every customer has a set of quality characturistics they would like and those they are willing to pay for. Our millers don't always need Cadillac quality wheat to produce flour for customers.

    Comment


      #32
      Charlie;

      As you say, the Japanese are paying Canada for quality and supply specific reasons, but are not paying more than fair market value.

      The CWB is obviously over competitive, (making market share gains at a cost to "designated area" farmers) in North America, exactly where does the single desk itself extract a premium?

      The US growers have a legitimate complaint, take the PPO contracts... a non-competitive basis... the pooling accouts... much room to lower prices as CWB cost is about 75% of FMV.

      Exactly how is the CWB going to win this US of A battle when the complaints are legit?

      Comment


        #33
        Not sure where you are going Tom.

        On bulk wheat, my experience has been that they do a good job of selling wheat at full North American value on any given day. The issues become more clouded when questions like timing of sales and how price signals are provided farmers through pooled prices.

        My own thoughts are western Canada should be carefull who we have fight our battles. The issue is marketing choice. I am not so sure Canada won't be having the same problems with the US in a more open marketing situation. Eg. Country of Origin Labeling on meat. Soft wood lumber dispute.

        The US has no sense of ha ha these days. I look for our neighbor to get much more protectionist over the next 5 years.

        Comment


          #34
          Charlie;

          I see the North American market place as the key to value added grain production on my farm.

          Canola for example... $10.00/bu locked in for next fall... minimum price locked in... 100% priced and no hedge liability... this is obviuosly a US market primarily... and the US has been a perfect gentleman with my farm and Canola production comming from Canada... same goes for high quality oats, flax, what more needs to be said?

          A transparent market is all the US of A is asking for; isn't that a fair request?

          Comment


            #35
            Charlie and Lee;

            If full fair transparent cash pricing were offered by the CWB, wouldn't this solve the US trade dispute... as we would know for sure on any particular day... if the CWB were stealing money from the pooling accounts to push a sale into the domestic North American market place...


            And is this not the obvious reason why the CWB will not offer a cash price... cause then they would be accountable to "designated area" farmers and the US of A alike.. for doing "price discriminating" give away sales that undermine domestic and international wheat and barley prices?

            Face it... the CWB chooses not to be accountable to anyone... is it any wonder it is under attack... and about to be destroyed?

            Comment


              #36
              Tom4cwb

              We should maybe move this discussion ahead into the front of the thread.

              I again am not so sure what you are getting at. There are two points of the issue - prices to customers (which the farmer can be if they do a buy back) and the price signals a farmer gets after all CWB sales activities have been process through the pooling process.

              On the selling price to customers, my experience has been that the selling price to North American customers has been fair/reasonable based on the North American price. Milling prices (realizing this is the offer side) is posted in the Globe and Mail. There is a spread which plugs in daily US wheat futures prices and the relevant basis/location adjustments. Things wouldn't happen a whole lot different in an open market and perhaps make us subject to the same type of harassment the US is heeping on us now.

              On the price signal side/pooling issue, there is no relationship between daily prices and final CWB returns - except as sales contribute to the pool results. Who should be more concerned about this process - western Canadian farmers or the US? My thoughts are the current pooling process is a negative factor to our competitiveness.

              Comment

              • Reply to this Thread
              • Return to Topic List
              Working...