Don't you mean 13.8 protein?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
First Wheat Sample
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Tweety 18.3 is coreect. I put a lot of groceries down. Started a new field last night and yield is up to 55 and pro dropped to 14.5. I'am very very suprised with my yields. A lot of people are in our area.
Comment
-
Nice try Klause but your conclusion is wrong. Research in the northern Plains proved over 7 tons per acre/per year of CO2 could be captured with good pasture management. This was proven over a 5 year trial.
Methane emissions are generally reckoned to be equivalent to 2.5tons a year of C02.
Most cattle operations in this part of the world use 4-5 acres per year per cow so we can sequester about 12 times as much as each cow produces.
Comment
-
Grassy,
Do you drive vehicles that have the minimum pollution and C02 footprint possible?
I just leased a 2015 Golf TDI wagon for my parts vehicle. Using about 5L/100km diesel with minuscule Urea consumption. Does not use/burn oil between changes. I leave the pickup parked when ever it is possible to use a smaller parts wagon.
Have you done everything possible on your farm... or could I see the black smoke rising from your equipment from far away... as was the norm 15-20 years ago?
Comment
-
That's about what we are runnin, 55 bus and 14 to 15 pro - 1 red , the Carberry yielding better and better color and grade than Goodeve . Goodeve was 45 and mostly 2 some #1 .
Comment
-
Tom, I was driving little diesel cars in the early 80s - 1.1 or 1.2 litre. Driving a Corolla currently which we use unless we need to be using a truck.
Not everyone grew up with the fossil fuel wastage of North Americans.
Making new cars has quite a carbon footprint too.
Comment
-
My wife wrote her thesis at the U of S on livestock, carbon sequestration, and methane emissions.
My post was tongue - in -cheek.... notice the wink faces.
All said and done livestock sequester 0.8 tonnes per year more than grain production however is 5% less efficient in a tonne per calorie comparison.
In other words, a toss up. South America I think the advantage was upwards of 6 tonnes per ha towards cattle.
Having to make feed and winter cattle really cuts into it the efficiency up here in na.
Comment
-
Those are "mainstream commodity livestock" figures Klause, those of us practicing alternate ways of managing grass and grazing are getting results towards the S American figures. Feedlots and the grain feeding model leave a big carbon footprint.
We can't banish winter but we can have animals grazing forages for all but 100-120 days versus the 220 feeding day winters commonly practiced on the prairies using fossil fuel grown and harvested feed
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment