Grassy... that may be true... but! And here's a big BUT.
these are averages. Remember my wife is from the Cabri area... they feed hay for jan and Feb... maybe a few days in Dec and march.
Raising cattle in the north interlake is a lot more carbon intensive than southern sk/alberta.
Plus you still have to truck your cattle then truck the beef. That's considering you are calf to finish which few are.
Again meat protein is less dense (compare a cattle liner vs a superB of lentils for instance).
I recall when we were mixed... on a liters/acre basis it took twice as much fuel to cut bale and haul hay than it did to seed spray and harvest.
Yes combines and big 4wds burn around 100 an hr but look at what they get done in that hour vs. How much hay you cut, bale and haul in an hour.
At the same time, and this was the premise of her thesis... a balance is required. Poor land can raise an awful lot of meat protein cheaply and with little environmental impact vs. Trying to grow poor crops on it.
At the same time on highly productive soil meat protein is far less efficient than grwin protein on a cal/acre basis.
Basically... what I'm getting at is we need both and the sooner cattle and grain guys can figure out how to work together instead of gnattering back and forth the sooner we can both make more money.
these are averages. Remember my wife is from the Cabri area... they feed hay for jan and Feb... maybe a few days in Dec and march.
Raising cattle in the north interlake is a lot more carbon intensive than southern sk/alberta.
Plus you still have to truck your cattle then truck the beef. That's considering you are calf to finish which few are.
Again meat protein is less dense (compare a cattle liner vs a superB of lentils for instance).
I recall when we were mixed... on a liters/acre basis it took twice as much fuel to cut bale and haul hay than it did to seed spray and harvest.
Yes combines and big 4wds burn around 100 an hr but look at what they get done in that hour vs. How much hay you cut, bale and haul in an hour.
At the same time, and this was the premise of her thesis... a balance is required. Poor land can raise an awful lot of meat protein cheaply and with little environmental impact vs. Trying to grow poor crops on it.
At the same time on highly productive soil meat protein is far less efficient than grwin protein on a cal/acre basis.
Basically... what I'm getting at is we need both and the sooner cattle and grain guys can figure out how to work together instead of gnattering back and forth the sooner we can both make more money.
Comment