Hi Everyone:
I received this open letter and decided to post it here to add to the debate.
Thanks,
Joe
OPEN LETTER ON MARKETING CHOICE
August 1st was supposed to be ‘Barley Freedom Day’ for Western Canadian farmers. Unfortunately, a Federal Court ruling prevented that from happening. It’s a setback for sure, but not the last word on this issue of freedom by a long shot. After meeting with the Prime Minister in Charlottetown, PEI last week, I can tell you that our Conservative Government is preparing to move forward. One way or another, we are going to provide marketing choice for farmers.
This Government has been clear and unwavering in its commitment to choice, starting with our election campaign in December 2005. That commitment was recognized and in the 2006 General Election, a Conservative MP was elected in the vast majority of ridings within the CWB region. We have been clear, open and transparent in moving toward this objective. Also, the plebiscite held last winter was dramatically clear. 62% voted to end the Board’s monopoly. On the strength of this strong democratic mandate we began the regulatory process. It was logical for us to think that since barley was moved into the CWB by regulations it could be taken out the same way.
If farmers needed any further proof about the positive impact that marketing choice would have on their bottom line, they need look only at what happened to prices following the court decision. Many barley growers were looking at record prices for their grain, but the court decision wiped millions of dollars of potential off of their balance sheets. A monopoly may work for some farmers, but thousands of others will be sure to tell those folks in the ivory towers of Winnipeg (and the provincial governments who funded them) of the frustration and outrage at what it has cost them personally. Their disappointment is palpable, and I share it wholeheartedly.
I am pleased to learn that the Wheat Board has finally recognized that the status quo is no longer an option. As Mr. Ritter has said, it can’t be “business as usual.” Farmers and governments will be watching closely to see if those changes are real and substantial, or merely window dressing. If the Wheat Board won’t take care of people, we’ll do it ourselves because we are the real friends of farmers.
Farmers gave us a clear message – a mandate for change – a change to marketing choice while preserving a strong, yet voluntary, Wheat Board. This is what western farmers want. And this is what Canada’s New Government is going to deliver.
Chuck Strahl
Minister for Agriculture and Agri-Food
& Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
I received this open letter and decided to post it here to add to the debate.
Thanks,
Joe
OPEN LETTER ON MARKETING CHOICE
August 1st was supposed to be ‘Barley Freedom Day’ for Western Canadian farmers. Unfortunately, a Federal Court ruling prevented that from happening. It’s a setback for sure, but not the last word on this issue of freedom by a long shot. After meeting with the Prime Minister in Charlottetown, PEI last week, I can tell you that our Conservative Government is preparing to move forward. One way or another, we are going to provide marketing choice for farmers.
This Government has been clear and unwavering in its commitment to choice, starting with our election campaign in December 2005. That commitment was recognized and in the 2006 General Election, a Conservative MP was elected in the vast majority of ridings within the CWB region. We have been clear, open and transparent in moving toward this objective. Also, the plebiscite held last winter was dramatically clear. 62% voted to end the Board’s monopoly. On the strength of this strong democratic mandate we began the regulatory process. It was logical for us to think that since barley was moved into the CWB by regulations it could be taken out the same way.
If farmers needed any further proof about the positive impact that marketing choice would have on their bottom line, they need look only at what happened to prices following the court decision. Many barley growers were looking at record prices for their grain, but the court decision wiped millions of dollars of potential off of their balance sheets. A monopoly may work for some farmers, but thousands of others will be sure to tell those folks in the ivory towers of Winnipeg (and the provincial governments who funded them) of the frustration and outrage at what it has cost them personally. Their disappointment is palpable, and I share it wholeheartedly.
I am pleased to learn that the Wheat Board has finally recognized that the status quo is no longer an option. As Mr. Ritter has said, it can’t be “business as usual.” Farmers and governments will be watching closely to see if those changes are real and substantial, or merely window dressing. If the Wheat Board won’t take care of people, we’ll do it ourselves because we are the real friends of farmers.
Farmers gave us a clear message – a mandate for change – a change to marketing choice while preserving a strong, yet voluntary, Wheat Board. This is what western farmers want. And this is what Canada’s New Government is going to deliver.
Chuck Strahl
Minister for Agriculture and Agri-Food
& Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
Comment