Stats Can bugging anyone?

[Incognito]

Has anyone thought of taking it to the World Human Rights Court?

http://www.worldservice.org/wsalstat.html

STATUTE of THE WORLD COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

WE, THE DELEGATES OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT OF WORLD CITIZENS, IN CONVENTION ASSEMBLED, 12 JUNE, 1974, IN MULHOUSE, FRANCE, REPRESENTING MORE THAN TWO MILLION ADHERENTS, AND ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD COMMUNITY, UNANIMOUSLY

A) ESTABLISH THE WORLD COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS;
B) AFFIRM our commitment to a global order under the Rule of Law, guaranteeing human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction or dissemination;
C) AVER that humankind's human rights are interdependent and are not abstract concepts, and that public awareness of such rights is therefore a guarantee of their protection;
D) RECOGNIZE the obligation to create a world order in which humans neither have to kill nor be killed;
E) DECLARE that the WORLD COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, premised on WORLD DUE PROCESS OF LAW and PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE, gives individuals and groups standing before a world tribunal;
F) ADOPT. the STATUTE OF THE WORLD COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS;
G) And DECLARE, that the WORLD COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
1) IMPLEMENTS the right to life;
2) AFFIRMS that concern for the SECURITY and FREEDOM of the INDIVIDUAL is greater than principles of JURISDICTION derived from TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY, NATIONALITY, and other technical concepts;
3) ASSERTS that everyone has the right to liberty and the security of the person and the unity of the physical, spiritual and moral creation of the earth and the equality of all human beings to be free of oppression or repression;
4) CONDEMNS militarization;
5) ESTABLISHES the remedy of WORLD HABEAS CORPUS;
6) ASSISTS regional and global formulae for implementing fundamental freedoms and human rights;
7) RECOGNIZES that the dignity of the individual is in keeping with essential moral needs, and this dignity finds expression in human rights;
8) Limits the arbitrary powers of government;

[Incognito]

My reasoning for the World Court:

1) Canadian law over grain marketing is not equal to Eastern grain farmers or farmers in Creston, B.C. with farmers in MB, SK, AB.

2) The rest of the world can see the individual rights of farmers are treated differently within Canada. Hell, the rest of Canada might see it.

3) Canadian courts with Liberal judges have not addressed that the law is applied differently in Canada - only that Government is allowed to discriminate under national liscencing - not grain marketing.

[parsley]

Incognito,

The CWB has every righy t to market organic grain.

They have NO RIGHT to discriminate when it comes to national licensing.

Licensing duties in the CWB Act applies equally to all applicants. Even Western ones.

Certainly human rights applies.

Easterners would be up in arms if they were denied licenses.

Parsley