Agstar77,
You had a great deal to the negative reaction... your initial post about the "Rumored" $10 Canola @ 32bu/ac... left out the CWB PRO or price expectations for the CWRS wheat @ 40bu/ac. At 1t/ac, the CWB PRO @ 240/ac at port position is nothing less than a bone shattering comentary on the $50/ac deficit caused by a marketer that refuses to extract the true costs of growing CWRS wheat fro the world market place.
Anyone not recoginsing the $190/ac return... while you expect almost double from your nonboard crop... would have truly missed the cleaverness of your post.
CP... you do yourself a BIG disfavour in posting profanity... Even though you and Agstar77 think it is "CUTE" use this kind of language to brow beat your opposition into submission... it is typical of people who have a weak point to make in the first instance.
The reaction was really quite predictable & logical... you expect Canola to pay the bills on your farm, yet the wheat you yourself market at through the CWB won't come close to breaking even at your farm gate according to your own admissions.
The CWB even removed the AB/SK/MB CWB system costs to get our "Designated area" wheat and barley to port position because this information is now offensive and again points to another failure of the "Single Desk" to extract value for its real client.
I am afraid your complaints are shallow, you will reap what you sow... and Agstar77 sowed plenty of offence... he is simply recieving back a small portion of the harvest he should be expecting in return!!!
You had a great deal to the negative reaction... your initial post about the "Rumored" $10 Canola @ 32bu/ac... left out the CWB PRO or price expectations for the CWRS wheat @ 40bu/ac. At 1t/ac, the CWB PRO @ 240/ac at port position is nothing less than a bone shattering comentary on the $50/ac deficit caused by a marketer that refuses to extract the true costs of growing CWRS wheat fro the world market place.
Anyone not recoginsing the $190/ac return... while you expect almost double from your nonboard crop... would have truly missed the cleaverness of your post.
CP... you do yourself a BIG disfavour in posting profanity... Even though you and Agstar77 think it is "CUTE" use this kind of language to brow beat your opposition into submission... it is typical of people who have a weak point to make in the first instance.
The reaction was really quite predictable & logical... you expect Canola to pay the bills on your farm, yet the wheat you yourself market at through the CWB won't come close to breaking even at your farm gate according to your own admissions.
The CWB even removed the AB/SK/MB CWB system costs to get our "Designated area" wheat and barley to port position because this information is now offensive and again points to another failure of the "Single Desk" to extract value for its real client.
I am afraid your complaints are shallow, you will reap what you sow... and Agstar77 sowed plenty of offence... he is simply recieving back a small portion of the harvest he should be expecting in return!!!
Comment