rook
Noted your question but don't have time to adequately answer (holidays tomorrow so cleaning things up).
You are right about the adjustment factor reflecting existing sales where money has been deposited in your pool accounts. It also is a recognition that the pooling process only occurs once a month. A markets rise within the month, the existing sales will look poorer relative to the current market and the drag factor becomes bigger. As markets fall in value, the existing sales look better/adjustment changes to reflect. It has become a counterbalance to stabalize the fixed price contracts around the PRO. Good, bad or indifferent is up for discussion.
Is this an indication of the CWB comfort with the PRO. Will have to think about. I use the EPO premiums (particularly at the 100 % level) as a better indication of risk.
Noted your question but don't have time to adequately answer (holidays tomorrow so cleaning things up).
You are right about the adjustment factor reflecting existing sales where money has been deposited in your pool accounts. It also is a recognition that the pooling process only occurs once a month. A markets rise within the month, the existing sales will look poorer relative to the current market and the drag factor becomes bigger. As markets fall in value, the existing sales look better/adjustment changes to reflect. It has become a counterbalance to stabalize the fixed price contracts around the PRO. Good, bad or indifferent is up for discussion.
Is this an indication of the CWB comfort with the PRO. Will have to think about. I use the EPO premiums (particularly at the 100 % level) as a better indication of risk.
Comment