• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CWB CWRS/DNS Basis -$8.77/t instead of $58/t

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    CWB CWRS/DNS Basis -$8.77/t instead of $58/t

    Charlie;

    I note the CWB Basis is not at all in step with US cash prices... particularily PNW vs CDN West Coast.

    Here was a report from my BASF "Weber Commodities Report"


    "Although October has been a down month for U.S. grain futures, is has been bullish for cash basis, with stronger domestic premiums effectively offsetting almost half of the deterioration seen in exchange prices for many commodities. The end game will be played in the cash market - not in futures - but I’m looking for it this winter - not this fall. Cash bids for SWW in Montana are still at $10.00 (thanks Mark) - that equates to a positive basis of $1.79 1/2 over CBOT December wheat. In Canadian terms - that would be equal to a 65.95 basis on SWW rather than the -28.77 on the fixed price contract. That difference equates to $2.58 a bushel"

    Why has the CWB wheat/barley basis not reflected the difference?



    I note the recent CWB News Release:

    "Newsroom
    2007
    CWB responds to inaccurate information on barley prices

    October 18, 2007

    Winnipeg - Ken Ritter, chair of the CWB's farmer-controlled board of directors, today responded to inaccurate information about barley prices.

    Yesterday in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said: "When it looked like there would be marketing choice for western barley farmers last spring, prices went up. When marketing choice was swept off the table, prices went down."

    Ritter pointed out that barley prices have been climbing steadily and that the Prime Minister's comments create the mistaken impression that barley prices move up and down only in response to the prospects of an open market.

    Ritter says the full story shows that from June 11 to July 31, 2007, grain companies anticipating an open barley market were offering farmers contracts of up to $4.75 per bushel for malting barley. However, since the federal court decision of July 31, which upheld single desk marketing of western Canadian barley, markets have climbed steadily to the point where the CWB is projecting returns for farmers of up to $5.06 per bushel at an Alberta farmgate. This estimated return may continue to rise as the CWB makes more sales at record values.

    "Grain markets are governed by many factors, including supply and demand, competition, quality and customer preference," said Ritter. He noted that Prairie farmers can expect significantly higher returns this year than their American counterparts, due to the disciplined selling of the CWB.

    For example, according to the president of the Washington Wheat Commission, many American farmers sold their wheat before the recent price surge - much of it at less than $5 per bushel. The CWB is indicating a return of $6.76 per bushel for No. 1 Canada Western Red Spring wheat 13.5 per cent protein, backed off to an Alberta farmgate.

    In the case of durum, a high-quality pasta wheat, U.S. spot values are rising because many American farmers priced at around $7 per bushel when they thought the market had peaked, according to the marketing director of the North Dakota Wheat Commission. The CWB has been able to capture rising market values, recently making sales of Canada Western Amber Durum wheat at values as high as $18.50 per bushel.

    Controlled by western Canadian farmers, the CWB is the largest wheat and barley marketer in the world. One of Canada's biggest exporters, the Winnipeg-based organization sells grain to over 70 countries and returns all sales revenue, less marketing costs to farmers.

    -30-"

    If the CWB had actually done what they say they did... what excuse is there for the CWB to totally distort the basis.... Cash FPC do not even closely resemble US Montana cash prices in Alberta!

    CWB distorts our whole grain market in Alberta.

    I Prepriced futures only... JUST LIKE MY AMERICAN FREINDS JUST ACROSS THE BORDER and the CWB appears ready and willing to steal/has already stole a good chunk of my 2007 wheat revenue.... on top of the lower prices I hedged. I am responsible for the futures. The CWB is responsible for the Basis.

    What can be done with our Crop Insurance to counter act this huge distortion in the market... which means I am faced with MUCH lower prices than the US Farmers the CWB is "crowing" about?

    EG: our Jan 07 Price @ $224/t for 1CWRS 13.5... should be returning $1.60/bu over the MGE futures hedged... yet the CWB is negative $8.77/t or negative $.23/bu... for a distortion of over $1.70/buCDN well over $60/t distorted by the CWB.

    It means for the line share of our 07-08 CWB pricings... we will recieve $216/t INSTEAD of Fair Market Value of $280/t for our wheat that was hedged.

    With a $50/t back off from west coast Canadian port CWB prices... this leaves our farm with $164/t for 1CWRS 13.5... and for the feed wheat the CDN system says much of our wheat is... this is an unbelievable mess!

    If I do the Basis today Charlie... what is done with the #4 milling grade/feed wheat discount?



    How will this be reflected (If at all) in Alberta Ag market pricings for our crop insurance... for instance?

    Can you see why some of us are so tired of this whole wheat "game" ... we are told to "risk manage" and the gov.'s allow the CWB to totally distort the market and take us to the cleaners!

    With CLub root on the move... we must grow MUCH more wheat... but guess what?

    With the folks with a short yeild... we are all up the creek without a paddle... No crop insurance price coverage... and all our city cousins thinking we are literally rolling in the dough!

    What can be done Charlie?

    #2
    An unintended consequence but the variable price benefit will offset some of the pain you indicate. Coverage for all crops will increase via a higher fall price (see afsc website for information - I can put links in on request).

    The basis used for wheat (2CWRS low protein) in the fall calculation is $40/tonne under the average MGE December futures price during the month of October. The average to date has been about $320/tonne (likely to come down a bit in the last week) or a coverage price of about $275 to $280. That is over double the crop insurance coverage prices in the spring but will be capped at 50 % increase or $225/tonne. That compare to the September PRO of $237/tonne (agree with other will likely to come down on October 25).

    As an interest, the difference between the Alberta crop insurance methodology assumes a basis of $20 over a converted MGE price versus today's CWB basis (not including the adjustment factor) of $7 to $8 under.

    Not so sure what you would have the Alberta government do other than continue to promote market choice. Realizing a farmer who is facing the situation on feed wheat will not like this comment but perhaps it is important for the farm community to face the pain and use this incentive to promote change versus the government handing out aspirins to mask. The issues you raise are legitimate issues the CWB (not the Alberta government) needs to deal with.

    AFSC information on the process around fall price calculations is located at:

    http://www.afsc.ca/doc.aspx?id=36

    Spring prices are at:

    http://www.afsc.ca/doc.aspx?id=52

    Comment


      #3
      Error;

      "Cash FPC do not even closely resemble US Montana cash prices in Alberta!"

      Should be; "Cash FPC do not even remotely resemble US Montana cash prices in Alberta now!"

      Comment


        #4
        Perhaps my biggest curiousity is where the comment comes that US farmer average prices will be below the CWB payments. Note we are only a quarter of the way through the crop year. Old crop wheat that was carried over and priced into 2007/08 pooling year will also be a drag on new crop payments. It would be be nice to see the background for this assertion other than anecdotal evidence.

        It is unlikely farmers in the US sold 100 % of their crop at the prices quoted. US farmers would have delivered on the percentage of 2007/08 sales from this past spring. I suspect they are some (not all)of remaining inventory at current prices. Some will stay in their bins to be sold this spring. That sounds like price averaging to me. Their sales are against cash business so that the costs of managing risk are minimal.

        The CWB manages against risk against the pooled price and all costs are born by the farmer (their risk management strategy is expensive with all costs born the farmer using the program). The CWB can foward sell (i.e. malt barley) without ever having a farmer delivery commitment. Issues like grade spreads are unknown at the time of contract signup and involve processes like basing them on initial payments which may have absolutely no relationship to the market at the time of delivery/when final payments are mailed out.

        Also note use the generic term barley. No mention malt barley. It would appear the CWB has cut the maltsters loose to suffer their own fate. With 50 % of the malt capacity in Alberta, their contribution to Alberta taxes/employment and a track record where malt has consistently be among the top 3 profitable crops, this is disturbing.

        Comment


          #5
          Reread and note the press release did mention malt barley. A whole 30 cent/bu improvement minus costs of not getting full payment on delivery. No mention current US/world malt barley prices. No mention of the $2/bu increase in international feed barley prices over the same period ($1/bu of which is being granted farmers and the other $1/bu being deposited into the contingency fund. Off your topic tom4cwb but interesting non the less.

          Comment

          • Reply to this Thread
          • Return to Topic List
          Working...