• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Growing Perennial Wheat

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Growing Perennial Wheat

    Parsley,

    Why are we not working on this in Canada?

    Dr. Charlie Rush Begins Second Year of Research on Growing Perennial Wheat in Texas

    This article is from Texas A&M University's AgNews.


    Bushland, TX-“The seeds may be lacking for perennial wheat to be grown on any significant basis in Texas but interest is not, according to Dr. Charlie Rush, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station plant pathologist.


    From wheat producers and cattle grazing operators to multiple state plant breeders, Rush is finding a groundswell of interest as he begins planting new varieties and starts a second year on his perennial wheat study.


    Rush obtained his initial perennial wheat seed stock from Drs. Steve Jones and Kevin Murphy at Washington State University in 2006.


    Rush•s first interest was in the perennial wheat disease resistance research by Dr. Tim Murray, professor and chair of the plant pathology department, and Jones, a wheat breeder.


    He will be looking at perennial lines of wheat ” wheat that regrows after harvest and may survive for up to five years •” for use in dual-purpose grain-grazing cropping systems or as a potential feedstock for the cellulosic bioenergy industry.


    Perennial crops by their nature increase carbon in the soil, reduce erosion and improve water quality, Rush said.


    Perennial wheat also offers the chance for producers to put cattle in the field earlier and graze longer in the spring, while still harvesting grain.


    "We"ve been told by producers that having an extra few weeks in March or even early April will be beneficial, because that is when the cattle are putting on the weight," he said.


    With perennial wheat straw being harvested for a bioenergy feedstock, Rush said environmental issues are not a problem.


    The straw can be cut short and the wheat quickly grows back, so the soil doesn’t blow.


    "We’re just at the beginning of this work," he said.


    "The perennial lines we’ve looked at has not been regionally adapted. So that’s where we are now. Once we get regionally adapted perennial lines, they will have even greater value."


    Rush, as well as Murray and Jones, is joining with Dr. Stan Cox, a wheat breeder with The Land Institute of Salina, KS. who has been working on developing perennial crops, to do a national study on perennial wheat adaptability.


    They will be sharing populations of perennial wheat varieties that will be planted in several locations around the country.


    Dr. Amir Ibrahim, a wheat breeder and professor with Texas A&M University soil and crop sciences department, and Dr. Brett Carver, Oklahoma State University wheat breeder, also are collaborating in the research.


    Carver has been interested in identifying a cool season perennial for several year, primarily for grazing, Rush said.


    Ibrahim is concentrating on the germplasm traits concerning disease resistance, heat tolerance and drought tolerance.


    The studies also are generating international interest, Rush said.


    He has been contacted by personnel at the Jon Innes Centre in Norwich, England, who want to help the United Kingdom address how agronomic practices affect habitat of and numbers of wild birds.


    They are looking for low-input perennial cereals and have requested seed from Rush’s trials.



    Research Update

    In September 2006, Rush planted three replications of 20 lines of perennial wheat provided by Washington State University, plus seven non-perennial varieties already in commercial production in the High Plains, for comparison.


    Additionally, the plots were bordered on one side with a variety highly susceptible to wheat streak mosaic virus and on the other with a highly resistant variety.


    Disease screening and forage quality sampling using remote imaging techniques to measure the biomass were completed throughout the growing cycle, Rush said.


    The first year of research showed the grazing is as good as any annual wheat, and cattle could have been put onto the plots by mid September, he said.


    The grain production was about half that of annual wheats, as expected.


    In the second year of his research, Rush said things will be headed in three directions.


    First, there will be the perennial wheat trials around the country.


    Second, wheats will be crossbred to get regionally adapted lines, he said.


    The best annual lines of wheat for this region will be crossed with existing perennial wheat lines to adapt the perennial trait into regionally adapted wheat cultivars.


    The resulting crosses that display the best agronomic traits and regrowth will be selected and backcrossed with regional wheats, Rush said.


    "This process will continue for about five years and by that time, we will hopefully have some well-adapted perennial wheats that we can begin to increase seed for early field testing," he said.


    The third part of the research is to go back to the first 20 lines of wheat he planted and carry forward the best 11 for further study on agronomic aspects “ fertilizer, water, insects and diseases.


    "We have to know if it comes back in the second year and is riddled with disease," he said.


    Rush said he will plant the 11 selected lines again in another location, along with letting the original plots regrow.


    "We didn•t know if we would get any regrowth here, and we did," he said.


    While the research is exciting and many producers have already contacted him wanting to put out test plots, Rush said it will just take time to get enough seed for on-farm studies.


    He also cautioned that this is high-risk research; it is a brand new program for Texas and it may not work in the long run.


    "This is still very preliminary," Rush said.


    "There’s a lot we don’t know about this.


    "That’s what makes it exciting. The potential is huge and that’s what I am looking at."

    See Related Websites/Articles:


    Texas A&M University
    Washington State University
    The Land Institute
    Oklahoma State University
    Texas A&M AgNews

    #2
    well i'm sure monsanto will find a way to insert the rr gene and charge $15/acre/year for producers to grow it. it's time for a paradigm shift where farmers grow perennial crops and mix them up so that legumes will provide the nitrogen and with a diversity of desirable plants the root zone won't allow weed invasions. we have all this seed cleaning technology so mixed crop production could be segregated after harvest. don't worry i'm just foolin' with ya. the seed/fertilizer/chemical companies would never allow it to happen.

    Comment


      #3
      to say nothing of the companies building airdrills. forgot about them. have to wonder why more farmers wouldn't want to operate in a lower cost environment. revenues would very likely drop some but you wouldn't be risking a $250,000 fertilizer bill on uncertain production.

      Comment


        #4
        If you don't like the technology, don't adopt it. If you don't like the company, don't deal with them. Luckily we live in a free country that doesn't restrict safe productive technologies, or the companies that sell them.

        Gotta go, my plow horses need oats.

        Comment


          #5
          Yeah the silver bullet, that we are all looking for, is technology. Keep the mushrooms in the dark, and feed them bull, you'll grow a terrific crop and make lots of loonies! Marketering is also very, very, very, very, very, impotent!

          Comment


            #6
            You know Burb, some of us have made money using technology. We had the choice, and reaped the benefits of our choice.

            If it was the wheat board that forced us to use the technology, would it be good then?

            Comment


              #7
              farmranger: Luckily we live in a free country that doesn't restrict safe productive technologies, or the companies that sell them.


              think so? why can't we have bse testing for market development then? why are imports of generics restricted? canada has very selective laws that are paid for by the large multinationals. overall who has made money off of all the technology of the last, say 30 years? we have fewer producers working on thinner margins and the multinationals continue to grow and gather more power. control of food production is/has been shifted to chem/fert/grain companies.

              Comment


                #8
                Jensend, does anything you mentioned force me to use a technology, which is what we were talking about?

                I do agree that there definitely is room for improvement in patent laws and chemical registration, but again, off topic.

                And since you mentioned freedom, being forced to sell below market price to a single, all powerful wheat board, violates a few of my freedoms too. And I dare say it has cost my farm more than the value of last years chemical bill.

                Comment


                  #9
                  nobody is forcing you to do anything. all i talked about was a change in technology to perennials for food crop production and some of the accompanying issues like plant breeders' rights. that's where i think the technology is a longterm disadvantage to producers. did you know one of the first pieces of legislation passed by the iraqi provisional govt. was a plant breeders' rights bill? go ahead and use the technology; be a friend to those personable young reps from the chem co.'s. i think in the shortterm you're forced to but in the longterm it does nobody any good.might be interesting if you address some of the other points in my first post. some guys are already multicropping with good results. the use of perennials would make it really interesting. course then that gps on your airdrill would be kind of redundant.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    great to hear they are working on this, makes some sense to me, I hope that in the process somneone is working on adapting the crop to the northern prairies and the growing season we have up here....

                    in the absesnce on govt plant breeding programs of any consequence we need legal protection for the rights of new seed varieties to attract investements..riding on the equipment this fall on the ag show they talked about NAWG in the US now hoping they would see biotech reinvestment in wheat breeding as they feel they are falling behind on tech compared to other major crops, this after they opposed Monsanto's foray into wheat breeding just a few years back....


                    ..Jensend...if that business is juicy enough as you would suggest you should invest your capital in stock of these publicly traded companies and reap the rewards, why farm and why grow crops....

                    I will stick with crops and cattle and using the technology to increase returns on my farm....

                    and if you do not like the new seed technolgioes you can go back to the older still registered varieties that do not have pbr or tech use agreements, there are still lots of them out there

                    Comment


                      #11
                      you see i agree with your line of thinking in the shortterm but if you look back over the last thirty years (and i've been farming longer than that although we're no longer in crops because of how i see the larger picture) and see how things have changed then look ahead (instead of back) down the road we've been travelling i think farmers will have less and less control over their industry and will more be producing to specs laid down by somebody else. this is fine as long as either the rewards compensate for the risks or risks are shared (same thing, really). the way i put it is that in my father's time if he got an early frost he made less money but there was some room in the price for a risk such as weather but now all the risk is on the producer and if you get froze you're screwed big time because not only is the price not advancing over time but the costs borne vby the producer have increased so dramatically. in the very early eighties when we inc. and rolled assets in, when we signed the final agreements my father sat in the lawyer's office and said he was glad he wouldn't have to deal with the things coming down the pipe. i think he had seen the beginnings of structural change in the grain sector and had a feeling for how it would go.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Tom.
                        I have been under the weather.Sorry for taking so long.

                        The economic benefits to the farmer for perennial wheat is incalcuable.

                        Changing weather patterns will have less impact upon a perennial crop.

                        The cost of can will lessen, for example

                        Parsley.

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...