• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The problem with marketing choice

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Dyno, has the CWB commissioned performance or other studies by anyone outside the U of S (with the exception of Darryl Kraft, U of M)? Andy Schmitz doesn't count, he's late of the U of S.

    But again the point is that universities should impart grads with the skills to exist in modern globalized agriculture, not confuse them with rhetoric and studies carried out with data so "secret" it is hidden from peer scrutiny.

    I know a lot of ag grads from the U of S. They are fine people. Perceptions aside, not one of those alumni are pleased with their former profs taking sides with the CWB.

    Braveheart

    Comment


      #22
      Now that's more like it Braveheart, carry on with your debate folks.

      Comment


        #23
        Dyno,
        I do believe what I say. I have listened intently to what the majority of the academics at the U of S Ag Departments have promoted for many years. There has traditionally been a bastion of thought when it comes to the Wheat Board at the U of S, dyno. I've observed it as a farmer, and I have observed it as someone who has gone in to lecture at the U of S.

        Ask yourself why historically, the U of S has never done an indepth study on the farmgate receipts of Board grains in comparison to farmgate receipts in the USA. Or what prevents value add in Board grains. Or the effects of the lack of value-added of Board grains in our communities. The University knows full well that the CWB is running on their policy cylinder instead of a legislative one, but they show no interest in helping put more money in farmers' pockets whilst they watch the CWB dipping out of the pooling accounts. All because they are committed to preserving the single desk above all else.

        Mostly, there has not been funding for projects such as these, but neither has there been the push for them by the academics. Are they too dumb or too political?

        In the last few years, there are a few breaths of fresh air in the U of S, and that is promising.

        Dyno, there has been a debate on the lack of integrity in our elites, and the inability of them to be able to maintain academic freedom. It is the subject of so many books, from the right as well as the left, and you will have read the typical ones like The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy by Christophr Lasch. There is a problem, and not only the paranoid recognize it.

        Parsley

        Comment


          #24
          Bmj182: May I remind you that 2/10 of the farmers produce 80% of the grains. Should 8/10 judge the 2/10's and force marketing upon them.

          Comment


            #25
            I wasn't suggesting that farmers are
            stupid! I am one myself! I was
            simply pointing out that from what
            I've seen alot of farmers make very
            poor marketing choices (selling into
            a falling market, always trying to get
            the highest price, etc.) I've seen a lot
            of .40 cent canary seed sold for .10!
            Personally I don't support the Wheat
            Board but they do take a good
            portion of the marketing work load off
            of a farmer's shoulders, whether you
            agree with them or not. Has this
            been good for Western Canada? No.
            Yes brokers would step in to provide
            advice, but from what I've
            experienced they suggest changes
            to your hedges to increase their fees,
            which turns into speculation!
            Farmers will be able to survive in the
            new environment, just be ready for
            more footwork regarding marketing.

            As far as my education is concerned
            the UofS is one of the finest schools
            one could attend, I believe I received
            the information quoted in my
            previous post from Red Williams.
            Whether or not you agree with him
            he is a very smart man, and has
            done a lot for the livestock industry in
            Saskatchewan. He never did say if
            he was for or against the Board he
            just quoted the study.

            Comment


              #26
              bmj182,

              The livestock industry in Saskatchewan. benefits immensely from the single desk. They have unlimited access to captive Board grains, because export licenses are denied. The pressure cooker for Board grain $$$returns only simmers even if CWB returns are miserably low,because there is no outlet to get higher returns for the wheat/barley grower. Low Board returns can never explode into the alternative....exporting.

              Cattlemen enjoy domestic priced wheat/barley for their feeders. They benefit from the fact that if the grain farmer doesn't like what the Canadian feed market offers to them, the grain farmer can eat it, because he sure can't sell into an alternative market. And Red Williams knows it well.

              Parsley

              Comment


                #27
                Parsley,
                Please forgive me, but do you need
                an export permit to export feed
                barley?(I've never looked into this), is
                the grain really captive as you
                suggest? The feedlot I sell to always
                pays .10cents/bushell more than the
                local elevator plus no elevation,
                dockage etc. I don't think that selling
                into an export market for feed barley
                would net that much more, most of
                the U.S. uses corn etc. However if
                I'm wrong so be it! Please share your
                ideas!

                Comment


                  #28
                  Every bushel of feed barley/wheat that crosses the border needs to be accompanied by a CWB export license. Even a bag...or jail.

                  Parsley

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Perhaps age but I might want to look at Saskatchewan differently.

                    1) Impact of the method of payment/crow. The government paid farmers to export verus develop domestic markets up to the mid 1990's. Alberta government changed this matrix starting in the late 1980's/early 1990's.

                    2) Saskatchewan has chosen to diversify in different ways than Alberta. I look at what Saskatchewan has tried in terms of not only pulse crops but other alternatives (corriander, caraway, borage, etc.) with respect from the Alberta side.

                    3) Saskatchewan is not sitting still on livestock industry iniatives. Late out of the gate in terms of timing but not to be ignored. How many of those cows Alberta sent east are not going to come home? I am also seeing a lot of Alberta ranchers following the cows and selling expensive Alberta/buying Saskatchewan land with price based on productive value.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      If the CWB is so sure they are the only ones that can market our grain then they shouldnt be scared to give us marketing choice.If they are so right and we are so wrong wont we as farmers go running back to them if we cant do better on our own? Why are they so scared??

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...